Rep Blasts Miley Cyrus “Undiscovered Gyrl” Nude Role Reports
Reps for Miley Cyrus are denying a recent celebrity scoop claiming the fifteen year-old Disney star is thinking about going nude on the big screen.
“The story is completely fabricated,” Miley’s rep fumed. “There’s no truth to it at all.”
The gossip first hit made headlines on Tuesday when MSNBC reported that Miley was interested in the lead role in Undiscovered Gyrl, a film adaptation of Allison Burnett’s novel about a suburban teen with a life on the wildside.
Written by Castina on July 24th, 2008 | Tagged as: Disney,Hannah Montana,Miley Cyrus,Movies,Today's New Music,TV,TV News
On October 12th 2008, hiiiiiiiiiiiii wrote:
so because your 18 you know all about her ? what are you as close as like her mum or sumthing ? ohh yehh your not so i dont think you no her at all since you havent met her or spoken to her before and supposedly meens nothing to you then ? tht doesnt meen its true . you dont even no her so how wood you non enything about her?
On January 13th 2009, David - the nudist wrote:
I'm not sure what to make of this one. On the one hand, it's too bad she's not really going to do this film as rumors said. But, on the other, if they were to shoot nude scenes, would they be innocent nudity or sexualized nudity, as Hollywood seems to be known for? While I wouldn't mind innocent nudity for Miley Cyrus, sexualized nudity would be bad. There's a difference between the two. Innocent nudity is nudism or at least being comfortable with being nude in non-sexual situations. Sexualized nudity, on the other hand, is akin to pornography or R-rated sex movies. So, nude is not lewd as long as it's non-sexual nudity…like the famous nude photo of Vanessa Hudgens. It's only lewd when it deals with sexualizing nudity in distasteful poses or doing things with oneself or with others that are deemed sexual. You can't dispute that as I've just explained the differences between non-sexual and sexual nudity.
On January 20th 2009, jow wrote:
wow
On January 27th 2009, Ryan wrote:
Let's face it guys. Maybe Miley Cyrus is not talented but she's making more in a year than you will in a life time. I'm not going to defend her but instead point ouut the obviously flaw that you spend your time bashing a young girl who has amounted to more than you ever will. I find it funny that you can be so dumb to post a message that makes you look even more dumb. Make fun of my response all you want because that'll just make me laugh even more and God knows I could use a laugh. Thank you to all those that make me realize my life isn't nearly as bad as yours.
On January 27th 2009, Ryan wrote:
Oh and if you're going to write an angry rant making fun of these girls that so passionately love Miley, use a freakin spell check once and a while. I can understand mistyping a few things (I do sometimes) but when your whole message is jibberish because you have the intelligence level of a 5 year old, you just look like a tool
On April 5th 2009, guy wrote:
ok i think miley should apsolutely put herself completely nude on the enternet. because she probaly has nice tits and boys love all that
On June 9th 2009, Viv wrote:
I hate to say this but whoever that person Lacy is that wrote that comment back in August last year, I hope you grew up by now?
Stating that you do "a lot" of research and then still let your ignorance show so clearly is just sad.
Such vulgar language in response to an 11 year old is inexcusable.
Go wash your mouth out with soap like your Mommy would and stop picking on children.