Nude Photos Of Miss California Carrie Prejean — “I’m Not Perfect”

May 5th, 2009 by Castina

Tagged as: Miss California Carrie Prejean, Pornstars

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Semi-nude photos of controversial Miss California Carrie Prejean found their way to the Web late Monday, and in a statement the beauty queen — whose anti-gay marriage stance has turned into a new career –defends the images and fires back.

I’m not even going to bother posting her response, as it is the usual “I Was Just Modeling and The World Is Persecuting Me” tomfoolery spewed by all famous slutbags once they’re caught with their pants down — literally.

(It must have slipped Carrie’s mind that there’s a clause in the Miss California contract she signed prohibiting her from being featured in scantily-clad images of any kind. Oops.)

Carrie says the photos — which feature the 21-year-old wearing only pink panties — were taken of her as a teenager and have been released “surreptitiously to a tabloid Web site that openly mocks me for my Christian faith.” Carrie claims the attacks on her and others who “speak in defense of traditional marriage” are intolerant and offensive.

(Read The Statement Here)

But do feel free to check out this report on Carrie Prejean’s nude photo scandal — and her response to it — featured on The TODAY Show Tuesday.

What's Hot at PopCrunch?

11 Comments, add yours

11 Responses to “Nude Photos Of Miss California Carrie Prejean — “I’m Not Perfect””

On May 5th 2009, ? wrote:

“Intolerant and offensive”? Gee, now she knows how sane people feel about her so called beliefs.
On May 5th 2009, ? wrote:

And, taken when she was a teenager my ass. Those boobs are post-op.
On May 5th 2009, Sarg wrote:

This shows how shallow people have become. If she had agreed with gay marriage there would be nothing but praise. Since she did not give an answer Democrats want to hear, she is now blasted, She gave her opinion and that is her opinion. This country has been divided for a long time. This is one reason. Republican doesnt agree with democrats then there trash in looked through their past is looked into, their taxes are pulled, even though the white house has a problem with their staff paying taxes. Its shallow for people to think they have to destroy a woman for her beliefs. That is what this is, she took photos, well the President took photos with Chaves, a mass murderer, he sat and listened to our country slammed, he got his start in Politics with low lifes. There is less concern for this than a woman taking photos. You that feel the need to stomp on this young woman but turn your head to more serious matters make me sick. I fougth for this country because we are a great nation, crying and going out of your way to destroy a young woman because she beleives marriage is between a man and a woman does not reflect freedom. SANE PEOPLE, of you think she is not sane because she has beliefs, you just showed how shallow you are. Its wrong for any woman to pose nude, but had she backed your beliefs she would not have been chased. I have friends that are gay, but while they disagree with her they dont feel the need to attack her. I have two friends that were united in 1990, they beleive in marriage, but they also beleive in freedom of speech. I dont care what you think of my opinion, I just get tired of seing peolpe that want things, like gay marriage because thats their rigth in a free country, but you blast her. Try living what you all preach. She will have to be accountable for her actions, but if you think destroying her life is the cost, then maybe your the ones that are little, not normal and just flat out sad
On May 5th 2009, ? wrote:

Hey, know what’s great abotu this free country and free speech you preach about? It covers MY free speech too! Its ALSO within MY rights to express MY opinions. You’re being exactly what you accuse all the liberals and Democrats of…nonsensical slander when someone happens to not agree with you. You tout free speech and then tell those who feel are wrong to pipe down.

I DO think she has her right to an opinion and right to express it, but its also MY right to call her a SO CALLED CHRISTIAN and a HYPOCRITE because that’s what I believe her to be!

And just so you know, I feel strongly about *any* woman who does this. She’d face scrutiny for the photos REGARDLESS because she signed a contract with Miss USA saying she would not partake in such photographs. She will probably lose her crown and it has NOTHING to do with her views on gay rights and EVERYTHING to do with HER OWN IMMORALITY.

And yes, I don’t think she’s sane, but not because she has beliefs. I don’t think she’s sane because its obvious she has not researched her own “beliefs” very well and has allowed herself to be indoctrinated into a bunch of santicimonious hogwash. The same hogwash that says “I’m a Christian, so I know better, so even if you aren’t a Christian, I’m going to enforce my beliefs on you.” Its rude, arrogant, and a violation of my Constitutional rights.

And THAT my friend is what you *really* fought for. That violation of my Constitutional rights.
On May 5th 2009, ? wrote:

Oh, and if you have a problem with people’s histories and backgrounds being looked into to see if they are credible and accountable then you are being childish and unrealistic. “Consider The Source”. I live by it.
On May 5th 2009, justgroovy wrote:

So, the young girl got talked into some questionable photos when she trying to break into modeling. Now those photos show up when she is being castigated for her beliefs about marriage. The dirty left strikes again. Is there really anyone who believes it was her idea to remove her top?

Having been associated with photographers most of my adult life, it has been my experience that there is a certain group of primarily male photographers that really live for doing that kind of a photo shoot with underaged girls. It is unfortunate that the trust the young girls entrust to these guys is so often misplaced. They are at best unethical and at worst exploitative. Where are the feminists who should stand up for this woman? Probably as spineless as the photographer who shopped these photos around.
On May 5th 2009, sandalous wrote:

I think it’s the hypocrisy people have an issue with. And using the guise of her “beliefs” to maliciously attack the gay community.
On May 5th 2009, Hater wrote:

Look at her, and listen to her, this is the reason she did not win Miss America. She has fake body parts and thoughts that are not as deep as my gold fish’s. She complains when people attack her, but she did not have a problem making an anouncement that she was taking on a personal attack against a HUGE group of “Americans” She deserves to get everything she gets and I hope she calls into a hole to wait until people forget about her!!
On May 6th 2009, Carolina de Witte wrote:

Although I don’t agree with her opinions, I did think she was pretty brave in airing them, knowing that doing so would most likely cost her the crown. That being said, her photos were mild, considering the kinds of pictures all sorts of ‘celebrities’ have out now. I don’t think that she should lose her place because of these pics. I’m a Christian, and some would consider me a hypocrite because I DO support gays, and gay marriage, etc. It’s possible to be a Christian and do many things others might not approve of. Looking at these pictures, I DO believe they were taken when she was much younger. I also have a hard time believing that the Miss America Foundation, or whatever it’s called, would have paid for her to have a ‘boob job’. I have no idea whether she has had one or not, it’s not my business. I still think she is as entitled to her own opinions as the rest of us. As I said, I totally disagree with those opinions, but I do think that it is wrong to try to ‘bring her down’ simply because you don’t support her opinions. A ‘real’ Christian would never stoop so low. Oh, I forgot. Most of you think that being a Christian is wrong.
On May 7th 2009, WyattEarp wrote:

Gay Marriage… is a freaking joke for a bunch of freaks. California got it right, MISS California got it right.
Just think, if everyone were gay, where would the world be…No Children? Gay Community my ass. It would be a pretty small community without the heterosexuals providing the people. You can take out the fact it goes against the bible, and just simply it goes against nature. I have searched adn searched for a nude picture of miss prejean but I still havent found one…anyone got a link to a nude photo of her? that bullshit picture posted on this sight is not nude, we have seen more of Miley Cirrus ass than that.
IF you dont wanna know the truth, you should not ask the question….Mr. Hilton
On May 11th 2009, Fritz wrote:

This whole thing is a joke. It makes no difference at all what her opinion of gay marriage is. How can a contest that had her parade around in a bikini that showed as much as the photos did be seriously concerned about these photos. The contest is all about sex and features sexy women. Now they say they are shocked to find out she is sexy? Everybody take a deep breath and go worry about something serious.