Nadya Suleman Octuplets Mom Interviews $2 Miliion
Nadya Suleman, the 33-year-old single mom who added octuplets to her brood of six kids last week, is wasting no time using her newborn babies as one-way tickets to Beverly Hills.
The mother of fourteen has reportedly offered Oprah Winfrey and ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer exclusive interviews on her now infamous fertility for an asking price of $2 million.
Nadya, who family members in Southern California believe is obsessed with children, has also sparked speculation that she is interested in a career in reality TV, following in the footsteps of TLC stars Jon and Kate Gosselin and The Duggars.
What's Hot at PopCrunch?
Related Articles:
- Octuplets Birth Video
- Ann Curry Nadya Suleman Interview (Octuplets Mother NBC Interview)
- Nadya Suleman Home Toliet-Papered
- Nadya Suleman Pregnant With Octuplets Pictures
- Hospital May Not Release Octuplets To Nadya Suleman
On February 3rd 2009, dani wrote:
Disgusting! Those poor kids…Her fertility doctor should have his license yanked! There are enough people these days having a hard time feeding two kids…now she’s got her hand out wanting help for something she did to herself. Nuts nuts nuts! Anyone who pays for her story is scum.
On February 3rd 2009, nate wrote:
If my peers (the public) is DUMB enough to give this women ANYTHING, She deserves to get rich. If any one of my 3 daughters did this they would cease to be my daughters and they know it, thats why it aint happenin in my family. poor kids. . . WHACKO ! AND WEAK mom PERIOD & how about the medical professionals? and you know, or should know, our tax dollars are involved. Human embarassments..
On February 3rd 2009, Elsie wrote:
Yup, that’s her name, Nadya. I don’t know if the last name is Gutierrez or Suleman. I don’t know where the Gutierrez comes from, and I doubt that’s her married name. I suspect that this woman is not the biological daughter of Angela and Ed Suleman. Also, I think she might have a MySpace page. I entered some identifying data and got 3 results. One of them seems to match very closely. It’s just a speculation on my part, though.
Apparently, someone created a bogus profile on MySpace, after reading my comment. Funny, though!
On February 6th 2009, Sean wrote:
I cant wait till the dollar collapses in this country just to see what and how far that 2 million plus is going to do for her. While shes occupied with exploiting those poor children and deciding what she wants to buy, the stupid thing better be buying gold. no one ever prepares for the future and ends up paying a terrible price….but it will be the kids who suffer the most!
On February 7th 2009, thomas wrote:
I have to say the sperm donor should be hit up for child support for all 14 kids that Nadya conceived. i would not pay here a dime for any interview at all.Not worth the month and time.Its her responsibility to raise all 14 kids and no one else. i bet her parents are getting tired of the responsibility of all 14 kids.If she cannot take care of them.I think the state of California should take them. If she had a screwed up childhood then these kids should have not pay for her mistakes.I hope Oprah and ABC do not pay her a dime for the interview she does not deserve this at all.She must be screwed up in the head because she has to get implanted the medical way instead of the natural way…..
On February 9th 2009, Ida wrote:
I don’t think the sperm donar should have to pay any child support to her. After all It wasn’t his choice to have 8 kids. The doctor supposedly implanted a few embryos, her body(On It’s Own) Took the liberty of multiplying into 8 embryos. Therefor, she actually didn’t need to have the in-vitro. And if her doctor would have properly tested her, he would have known that. Let alone the fact that after you have a total of 5 kids, i think its time to be fixed. There should be a law for it. The Duggars Disgust me, and i don’t know how anyone would want to model their life.
On February 9th 2009, sheila wrote:
Some idiot will end up paying her money for this-sad. I bet she did this for that reason. I think she saw an opportunity while watching Jon and Kate and other shows that have shown large families, and thought if she had enough children she could get in on the action too. She is nuts. I’m not a huge fan of fertility treatment because so many put in more than 2 embryos resulting in large multiples. She already had 6 others, it isn’t like she was a first time mom. I think a psych eval should be done on her. Who does she think she is? And honestly a single mom of this many to boot- not fair for those kids!
On February 9th 2009, Chris McCallum wrote:
Hi ! There is a lot of us out there who would like to know where she out the money at for this invitro treatment. I ‘m married, we both work, pay for our insurance out of pocket and we still can not afford this treatment. She is a single , mother ( with several children ) and does not work. To me this is just a slap in the face. I’ve been to infertility clinics , they laugh at you , if you do not have the money up front. It just makes me mad to think that she’s done this with tax payers dollars. Plus who’s going to provide for these children “ME” . This is just not right ! There are many of us couples out there who would die for the chance to have children. We could provide for them , give them a nice home , with two parents . The only problem is that our insurance tells us that what we have is infertility , so they refuse to pay for the treatment ! How has she pulled the wool over everyones eyes ? I would like this treatment for FREE !
On February 10th 2009, Suzanne wrote:
The 2 million needs to go to Kaiser Permanante to pay for the neonatal ICU bill. They have asked the state of california to pay the bill since Nadya has no income. Well 2 mill is income. Pay for the hospital and put the rest in a trust fund for the kids that she can’t touch or have more IVF treatments or cosmetic surgery!
On February 11th 2009, MBC wrote:
There are no words to adequately describe the bold and proud idiocy of Nadya Suleman. There she sat, in her big TV interview, as pleased with herself as if she’d been the first woman to land on the moon. Which is where she comes from, if you ask me. She is a combination of the worst traits a human being–or an alien–can possess: narcissism, self-indulgence, pathological lying, massive ego and need for attention, shameless greed…Ugh. I couldn’t believe this horrid little con artist insisting she’s never taken a penny of public assistance and doesn’t intend to–while she has no money and has had plenty of welfare–and how she expects her parents, the community and any other victims she can snare to help her raise her litter–while she, of course, goes back to school! And then she’s trying to cash in on her celebrity, with book and reality TV deals and God knows what else. Fortunately, in a CNN poll asking “Would you buy a book about Nadya’s story?”, 99% of the respondents said “NO!” Yay! She doesn’t deserve a penny from anyone, the state included. She’s made her bed–let her lie in it, with her 14 offspring!
On February 11th 2009, Erin wrote:
Give her a break and a shot at raising her kids. We pay for alot of things that we think that we shouldn’t. Shut up and suck it up!! It’s life!! If she fails her children then the govt. should step in, but leave her alone until then. All of you that say that she should not be paid will most definately be watching the show yapping the whole time about how stupid she is. But you will be upping the ratings now won’t you!! Think first before you condemn. And no, I am not on welfare and have not used fertility. I have 3 beautiful natural born children and a good job with a husband.
On February 12th 2009, Lorraine wrote:
Miss Nadya’s parents need the help.
Miss Nadya needs to have someone in control of her money. She did not need any more children, but now she has the publicity and notoriety she seems to desire.
And how many children will be enough for this unstable person?
Now her name is known worldwide, and someone puts up a website for help for her children, and uses her name. My suggestion would be to change the name of the website to “Octuplets”. Remove the mother’s name.
I would never donate to anything that promotes her name and bad behavior.
As for giving her a shot at raising her kids, it appears that she was not the one raising the six children she already had.
She had $165,000 and let her parent’s home, the home of her 6 children, go into bankruptcy while she is running around getting her nose and lips, and whatever fixed. Something wrong with this picture.
On February 13th 2009, Lisa wrote:
This woman is pathetic, irresponsible, selfish, and exploits her children for fame and money. Only idiots give her donations. She will use the money to pay for more IVF procedures, and for her beauty care. I feel for her children, but they will never get the care that they deserve. No parents want to put their unborn child at risk of being born with some kind of disabilities. This woman should be charged with child endangerment and abuse. What this woman needs is mental health care. Clearly she is wacko.
On February 13th 2009, Lydia wrote:
This woman is despicable. The love she espouses is not for all her children; it’s for herself, her self-aggrandizement. She’s delusional and inspires everyone to despise her. Those children need to be taken from her and placed with responsible, caring parents.
On February 15th 2009, Aaron Lohoefener wrote:
EVERY last fucking cent from Oprah and other high dollar idiots should be divided to pay for food, and creditors first. That’s 3.4 million so far, a start.
On February 16th 2009, Denisia Harmonica wrote:
Everyone should think of these babies since she is not and is only seeing dollar signs!!! If she does these interveiws and receives money all the hospital and dr. bills should be paid for first and the the rest put in trust funds for these 8 children. And also there should be a conservator for all monies that goes through her hands so it is spent right. Since she was unemployed and could afford the infertitlity treatments I think some of the Socail Secruity checks she received for the other children might have been used to pay for it.
California is holding tax returns this year how can they have money to pay her bills if they can’t give the tax refunds back to the taxpayers!!!!!!!!!!
On February 16th 2009, Carole Winter wrote:
This is absolutely the most disgusting thing I have ever heard of. This woman has mental problems. She is not interested in a loving family she is only interested in her own fame. Why on earth they would pay her two million dollars to have her on their programs blows my mind. Everyone should totally ignore her and see where she manages to handle that many little children. If the media would only stop all this fuss you would see a miserable mentally retarded woman
that would probably put those children up for adoption. If I was her mother I would put her in a mental instutition and let women who can’t have any children adopt these. They would all have a better home.
On February 16th 2009, Alice wrote:
I’ve always believe that rights and responsibilities must be coextensive – if you cannot fulfill the responsibilities, you don’t have the rights that go with them. For those who believe a person’s “right” to have children is absolute, let them pay for these babies. The rest of us don’t want to. And by the way, the state of California is dead broke – if that state pays the astronomical medical bills for these babies, how many more teachers and other state employees will have to be laid off to cover the cost?