Pop Crunch

Nadya Suleman Food Stamps: Public Assistance For Octuplets Mom

8

February 10th, 2009 by Castina

Tagged as: Nadya Suleman


OCTUPLETS/
We’ve got good news for taxpayers in the Great State of California. You get to help support our country’s first surviving set of octuplets!!

Nadya Suleman, the 33-year-old mother of six who gave birth to eight babies two weeks ago, has been receiving public assistance benefits, The Los Angeles Times has learned.


Nadya, of Whittier, California, will receive $490 a month in food stamps, in addition the so-called octomom receives SSI benefits for three of her children, who are disabled, according to The Times.

As you may recall, in a recent interview with The Today Show’s Ann Curry, Nadya said that she was not on welfare.

“I’m not receiving help from the government. I’m not trying to expect anything from anybody. [I] just wanted to do it on my own. Any resources that someone would really, really want to help us, I will accept, I would embrace.”

Well, she has an interesting reason for saying that.

“In Nadya’s view, the money that she gets from the food stamp program … and the resources disabilities payments she gets for her three children are not welfare,” says Nadya’s publicist Michael Furtney . “They are part of programs designed to help people with need, and she does not see that as welfare.”

What's Hot at PopCrunch?




8 Comments, add yours

Related Articles:

8 Responses to “Nadya Suleman Food Stamps: Public Assistance For Octuplets Mom”

  1. On February 10th 2009, raleigh wrote:

    Now she is saying she’s a virgin?

    http://wineandexcrement.com/octuplet-mom-suleman-is-still-a-virgin/480/

  2. On February 10th 2009, jojo wrote:

    Someone needs to sue the doctor that allowed her to have the invitro fertilization..no one needs to be pregnant with 8 babies at once

  3. On February 11th 2009, Maritza wrote:

    My husband and I are both professionals and have stable jobs. We love kids but 3 is MORE than enough!
    I just cannot understand what’s lurking in Nadya Suleman’s mind. Maybe she wants to set a record…Ripley’s, Guinness, Nadya’s waiting for you to buy her story!
    This miserable woman is one kind of a heck who wants to make business out of innocent kids. She’s sick in mind. Getting surgery with Angelina Jolie’s facial features proves that she really is SICK, obsessed, annoying, scary and weird!

  4. On February 11th 2009, Lee wrote:

    “Now she is saying she’s a virgin?

    http://wineandexcrement.com/octuplet-mom-suleman-is-still-a-virgin/480/

    Ummm…Wine & Excrement pretty clearly states that it’s a parody site (like The Onion).

  5. On February 11th 2009, Helene wrote:

    Even if companies and people step up to help (for the benefit of the children – not because of her), her ability to provide the emotional and physical attention these children will need and deserve is highly questionable. We don’t let people have obscene quantities of cats, dog or pets in a home that is not equipped to handle them. It appears as though cramming that many people in the existing home borders on the same obscenity. A home of 1,569 sq. ft. divided by 17 people provides a total of 92.3 sq. foot per person!

    No one wants these kids to suffer. Yet how do we as a society help provide for these children’s needs without reinforcing this woman’s selfish indulgence and encouraging others to act so irresponsibly?

  6. On February 15th 2009, Aaron Lohoefener wrote:

    This ENTIRE farce is an obscenity, of and unto itself. orchestrated by heinous doctors wanting to make THE name for themselves, and using an obvious moron to haul the load. In the 40’s we’d have called them Nazi’s performing medical experiments on live humans.
    Or am I out of line on our fine medical persons involved in this shit?
    Aaron Lohoefener, Parkersburg WV.

  7. On February 16th 2009, mom2 wrote:

    in order to adopt children, families must undergo intensive background screenings, home visits, and letter of recommendations from at least 3 non family members; so why in the world do not have the same for people who want to have such large quantities of babies. I have never had IVF but have had several friends who have because they wanted A baby. They were implanted with 2 embryos NOT 6. This dr is very unethical and I think that background screenings should be mandatory for IFV.

  8. On March 13th 2009, Hard Working Mom in OKLAHOMA wrote:

    I believe that public assistance is there for people who may need TEMPORARY help, due to a variety of reasons. But there are many who view these free benefits as a way of life. I call them “PROFESSIONAL COLLECTORS” They know just how much they can get from any & every available program. When someone is on public assistance, whether it be Food-Stamps, SSI, Welfare etc. they should not be permitted to bring more kids into the world. It seems to go unnoticed when these moms who are the “PROFESSIONAL COLLECTORS”, spit out a kid every few years and collect more and more benefits. But when OCTO-MOM spit out EIGHT in one fell swoop, while on Public assistance, lots of people have FINALLY sat up and took notice of what I have been saying all along !!!! IF YOU CAN’T PROVIDE FOR THE ONES YOU ALREADY HAVE, STOP MAKING MORE !!!!!

    Oh yah, and I think the IDIOT DOCTOR who performed her invitro should be the one to support those kids, NOT THE TAXPAYERS !!!

What do you think?

comment policy





twilight new moon t-shirts