Pop Crunch

Nadya Suleman Fires Angels In Waiting Free Nannies

4

Octuplets

Octuplets mother Nadya Suleman has fired a nonprofit group of nurses that helped care for her children, accusing the group of spying on her and reporting her to child welfare officials, her spokesman confirmed late Monday.



Nadya Suleman has brought four of her eight newborns home from the Whittier, CA. hospital where they were born on Jan. 26. Angels in Waiting, a non-profit charity organization, announced their plans to assist Suleman in raising her 14 children during a March 14 taping of The Dr. Phil Show.

“Yes, it’s true. I released AIW,” Suleman said in a statement. “It was really bad. That’s all I can say. I can’t confirm, why, in particular. I will be releasing the details soon.”

Nadya’s attorney Jeff Czech says the relationship was tense between the now-infamous Octomom and employees with the not for profit organization from the start.

“Suleman felt uncomfortable by some of the things that Gloria Allred said, starting with her complaint to CPS.”

Nadya had several confrontations with the nurses, Czech explains, but the situation grew particularly unbearable on Sunday, when she came to believe that Angels in Waiting founder Linda West-Conforti was allegedly filing a report against her with child welfare officials.

Spotted@



Written by Castina on March 24th, 2009 | Tagged as: Nadya Suleman


4 Responses to “Nadya Suleman Fires Angels In Waiting Free Nannies”

  1. On March 24th 2009, Vermithrax wrote:

    Go away.

  2. On March 24th 2009, justgroovy wrote:

    Enough…put this lady in a psychiatric treatment facility where she belongs and give those kids to families who will love them and care for them. This is just going to get worse from here on out. I hate it when Children and Family Services Division steps in when the mother is trying to make things work for her kids. In this instance I encourage them to step in quickly.

  3. On March 24th 2009, Lisa Nagley wrote:

    Just because you don't like somebody does not mean that they are a bad mom.  Her kids look well cared for to me.  From what I can see she looks like a good and caring mom.  Everyone should stop being so hateful and judgmental.  Her kids are fed, they go to school, they live in a nice home, she's hiring her own nurses.  WTF?  She has done everything that has been asked of her to accomodate these babies. 

  4. On March 24th 2009, Portlyric wrote:

    It's not that she's a bad mom, It's that she is a sociopathic monster who's incapable of acting in the best interests of her children. Animals are housed and fed. Most of us have higher standards for humans.

What do you think?

comment policy





Related Articles: