Miss California Nude Picture — Carrie Prejean Naked Photo Scandal

548731672009-05-05+01%3A30%3A22Castina

Carrie, Carrie, Carrie….What are you doing? Trying to preserve the “honor” of “traditional marriage” by taking topless photos of your new tetas we see. What would Jesus say?!

NSFW Topless Photo of Miss California After The Jump!

The blogosphere is ablaze with buzz about topless and semi-nude photos of controversial anti-gay marriage activist Miss California Carrie Prejean. We hear there’s a whole series of these suckers about to leak. The first photo, which appeared just a few minutes ago on TheDirty.com, shows a woman — who bares a stricking resemblance to the beauty queen — staring seductively into a camera while wearing only a pair of pink panties and using a strategically placed arm to cover her naughty bits.

Shame…

Alicia Jacobs, Entertainment Reporter at KVBC in Las Vegas, has seen all six of the photos and says some are much more revealing. Alicia believes the flicks may have been taken after Carrie’s pageant-financed breast augmentation about six weeks ago.

Hmmm…These explosive pictures could be devastating for Miss California, whose anti-gay marriage campaign recently resulted in a partnership with the National Organization for Marriage and helped to make her increasingly popular with right-wing conservatives.

Can you guys believe the nerve of this bozo? Using the Lord Jesus Christ as an excuse to support inequality when she’s just as big a sinner as anyone?

Let this be a lesson to us all; you may want to refrain from chastising other people about how they live their lives when there are digital photos of your ass buried on somebody’s hard drive. This reminds me of something my mother always said when I was growing up- Ah, that’s right, something about stones and glass houses. Ring a bell?

Written by Castina on May 4th, 2009 | Tagged as: Miss California Carrie Prejean,NSFW,Pornstars

54873167 Responses2009-05-05+01%3A30%3A22Castina to “Miss California Nude Picture — Carrie Prejean Naked Photo Scandal”

On May 4th 2009, ? wrote:

I agree with you Castina. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Her sins aren't any better than anyone else's sins. What's even sadder is, how would gay marriage hurt or effect her life in anyway? Meanwhile, she's leading many to sin and go astray by taking those photos. According to the Bible, she will have to answer for that fact.
On May 4th 2009, Castina wrote:

Thanks for commenting, hun. I don't know why people can't just mind their own business where the whole gay marriage argument is concerned. They're not bothering anyone….
On May 4th 2009, Sarah Elizabeth wrote:

i hate her
On May 4th 2009, Kim wrote:

Except she didnt chastize anyone, she simply stated her personal opinion. I dont recall her saying gay people were awful, horrible or even sinful. But feel free to enlighten me if I missed something.

And also the bible doesnt say "thou shalt not take backless photos" lol.
On May 4th 2009, Castina wrote:

I think you missed the part where she joined forces with an an anti-gay marriage organization (NOW) in a bid to keep marriage between a man and a woman…There was no problem when she was only stating her opinion — while some might see it as short-sighted — but she's begun actively working to support discrimination against an entire group of people. There's your problem. Infringing on other people's freedoms sort of counts as condemning them as "awful, horrible, and sinful" in my book.

And if you don't have enough connected brain cells to see the trouble with people who claim to be Christian taking nude photos of themselves…I can't help you.
On May 4th 2009, Steve wrote:

The only reason you have a problem with her,is she didn;t give the p.c.. answer.

As far as her "topless" pictures,no Christian claims to be perfect….ever.We know what the Bible says…

"For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God."
On May 4th 2009, Castina wrote:

You conservatives will argue with a sign board. I have a problem with anyone who uses the word of God to justify homophobia, racism, or any other ideal that shuns one sector of society from the masses.

"No Christian claims to be perfect –" Keeping your clothes on doesn't require perfection, just self-respect.
On May 4th 2009, Ginn wrote:

This wannabe Christian, religious or whatever the hell she is claiming to be, is full of crap and is looking for her 15 minutes of fame! A true Christian, at least the pure ones not the ones that are now claiming to be Christians after being druggies, gangsters, x-inmates, prostitutes, strippers or whatever else, would they ever pose in their lace underwear and breasts hangin out, she is nothing but a joke! I've met real Christians, they dress properly, wear no make up and would never be caught doing what this skank did!
On May 4th 2009, Greg wrote:

On May 4th 2009, Steve wrote:

The only reason you have a problem with her,is she didn;t give the p.c.. answer.

As far as her “topless” pictures,no Christian claims to be perfect….ever.We know what the Bible says…

>> Then please STOP telling everyone else what do to and how to live their lives! Look at yourselves for a change.
On May 4th 2009, Steve wrote:

"Keeping your clothes on doesn’t require perfection, just self-respect."

It was a picture! And what is wrong with the human body? After GOD created it.

"I’ve met real Christians, they dress properly, wear no make up and would never be caught doing what this skank did!"

Are you judging her?.Since when is it a sin to wear make-up?

She has been maligned for stating what the majority of Californians believeand voted on.
On May 4th 2009, Richie wrote:

Hey! So what if she was topless! And so was Eve topless in the bible. She never claimed to be perfect. Hey, so they who has never sinned, let them cast the first stone.
On May 4th 2009, Dolo wrote:

She's such a pretty girl. All Christian girls should be so pretty. I think that should be legislated. Really. Let's make a law that requires all Christian girls to be beautiful in the same way fashion magazines define beauty. 'Kay? "kay! Wouldn't that be cool? I mean, then that way, all Christians would be beautiful. There'd be no ugly Christians. In fact, I'd go further and say we should torture and maim ugly Christians for not living up to the standards of beauty. Really, we could throw stones at them or something. That'd be really cool! We could do it at the mall, if front of everyone! I'd like that. Hey, we could even turn the mall into a church!!! That would be so RAD!!!

Gawd, I can't wait!!!
On May 4th 2009, Sarah wrote:

She never "chastised" a single person. She merely gave her opinion, an opinion that happens to be the MAJORITY opinion in America.

I seriously hope she ends up suing someone. The way she has been treated is utterly deplorable and has only shown me and the rest of the world what INTOLERANT BIGOTS the homosexuals are. Wow. They are childish, arrogant brats who are obsessed with themselves (and their sex lives) and who are competely egotistical and narcissistic. It's been real eye opening the past month watching them be the gross children that they are.

Why should they not be allowed to marry? Because they can't even act like adults!!! Children should not marry.
On May 4th 2009, Jon wrote:

I agree with her – marriage is between a male and female. No one has ever heard of female in a hetero relationship with a female or a male in a hetero relationship with a male. If gays and lesbians want to be in a relationship that's all fine and dandy. The big deal about it is the insurance, benefits and inheritance – if they want to pay the premiums to cover the insurance etc – what's the big deal. Next thing we will hear is someone wanting to marry their dog or they pet animal – is this country going to start recognizing that too? Is this how stupid and rediculous this world is getting? As far as the religious aspect goes – if someone were to say God is a fag or a lesbo I wonder what ripples that would send and how people would react….
On May 4th 2009, drew wrote:

the stupid slut was given a standing ovation at the dove awards by stupid christians ! i have to tell you i am really enjoying this story —- a blonde stupid bimbo the face of the republican party —– –it cant get any better than this
On May 4th 2009, rosco_rhemer wrote:

i sure would love to poke her.
On May 4th 2009, T wrote:

Now lets see pics of Perez sucking on a shit dick
On May 4th 2009, George wrote:

It's amazing how many times the conservatives glom onto witless beautiful woman to push their agenda.

Palin, Coulter, etc. They even have a pinup calendar
http://www.cblpi.org/calendar/

The righties believe all they need to do is use sex to sell their tired, bigoted ideas and men will fall for it.

Pushing their so called "values" may have worked for a while, but now it's just pathetic.
On May 4th 2009, Bob wrote:

Has anyone noticed how people with no standards for right and wrong (liberals) seem to use my Biblical Christian (conservative) standards to judge others. Yes, as a Christian, I am to strive for a higher morality. That does not mean we will ever attain it. We just set the bar higher. Seems to me that setting the bar high is better than not having a bar at all. That being said, Miss Prejean should have her Miss California title pulled if she is, in fact, the woman in the pictures. Christian's need to follow the rules. We are commanded to obey the rules of the land insofar as they do not violate God's laws.
On May 4th 2009, Gary wrote:

Who has the right to judge anyone if we can't judge someone that just adds the title "Christian" to it? And to paint an entire minority with one brush yet withhold from showing the hypocrisy of her actions is showing no standards of decency as well.

You are so quick to judge same sex equality yet I can assure you that there are millions of couples that do want marriage because they love each other and are faithful to each other. Let's ask Newt Gingrich about fidelity. Let's bring up Vitters with his diapers and prostitutes.

And if people want to live differently than you-they are supposed to be able to do so in a Democracy. Live and let live.
On May 4th 2009, paulo wrote:

I have listened and read Carrie Prejean's answer to the gay marrige union over and over again and you can call me dumb or whatever, I do not see ANYTHING WHATSOEVER offensive in that response. She answered the question very well, no offence to anybody. About the picture, it doesn't look nude to me at all, unless the defination of nudity has changed since I checked it in the dictionary, one minute ago.
On May 5th 2009, David wrote:

I love her more now than ever a good moral girl with a body like that she is now officially on my top 5 list
On May 5th 2009, uncgpc wrote:

Sarah,

Let's see, the gays are finally treating people like you the way you have always treated them, and the gays are the intolerant bigots?

Those in glass houses…..etc., etc., etc.
On May 5th 2009, Ticktockticktock-it- wrote:

Can't wait for her full-length porno DVD(s) to surface.

I bet she'll be gettin' it doggy-style, screaming and moaning as a dozen guys give her a bukkake shower, all the while holding up a sign that reads:

"I am being forced into this! The left-wing conspiracy(tm) MADE me create this porno video, so that they could later disgrace me."

Seriously, I'd pull it out right then and there and beat my bishop like it owes me money!
On May 5th 2009, shauna wrote:

Poll: do you think, following these new raunchy photos of Carrie Prejean, that she should lose her Miss California title? I posted it here, please vote:
http://www.pollsb.com/polls/p2114896-carrie_preje…
On May 5th 2009, vanderlt wrote:

wow, what a mess. liberals can't wait for what they consider "inconsistent" and raunchy? wow. just because she disagrees with your views? Now that is tolerant huh? It is the epitome of intolerance. your vitriol does not surprise me at all. simply amazing.
On May 5th 2009, ? wrote:

Sarah said:

"She never “chastised” a single person. She merely gave her opinion, an opinion that happens to be the MAJORITY opinion in America."

So says the loud Christians. But just because a bunch of rabid, foaming at the mouth Christians showed up on poll day, doesn't mean they're the majority opinion holders in this country. Not to mention the fact that its supposedly a majority opinion (in your mind) does not make it a valid argument. I'm sure at one point most of our country support slavery. And since when is going on an all out campaign to stop gay marriage *not* chastising anyone?

"I seriously hope she ends up suing someone. The way she has been treated is utterly deplorable and has only shown me and the rest of the world what INTOLERANT BIGOTS the homosexuals are."

Sues? For what? She's getting the backlash and criticism she deserves! And you're calling homosexuals intolerant bigots? When you say this?:

"Wow. They are childish, arrogant brats who are obsessed with themselves (and their sex lives) and who are competely egotistical and narcissistic. It’s been real eye opening the past month watching them be the gross children that they are. Why should they not be allowed to marry? Because they can’t even act like adults!!! Children should not marry."

Referring to them as children and stereotyping an entire group as "gross" and narcissistic? And you're calling everyone else an intolerant bigot? Lady, you need to get your head checked and fast. You sound like a child, yourself.

As for the rest of you who can't see the correlation between Christian hypocrisy and Miss California getting a fake rack and posing for provocative photos…yeah, you're right Castina, they can't be helped. Period. When I was raised in my fundamentalist Christian home with a pastor for a father, I wasn't even allowed to wear tank tops in my own home. And if I had cleavage and a male was around, especially my father, my mom shamed me. 'Cause real Christians believe in modesty. Period.

I'm so disgusted by the Internet comments in support of this stupid woman. Some people will do *anything* to make excuses for the idiots that reinforce their own vapid, ignorant, and close minded "beliefs".
On May 5th 2009, HAHA wrote:

What I find offensive is that religion is a big deal in the 21st century.
On May 5th 2009, RK Wright wrote:

On May 4th 2009, Steve wrote:

The only reason you have a problem with her,is she didn;t give the p.c.. answer.

As far as her “topless” pictures,no Christian claims to be perfect….ever.We know what the Bible says…

“For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.”

I agree Steve, but why then is the sin of the homosexuals any worse than the sins of the nudie model? And these were not just nudie shots of an ADULT woman, these were child pornography images because she was under age at the time of these photos. Will they arrest the photographer, or her parents for allowing their minor daughter to pose semi-nude? And what about the lies she told the Miss California Contest, that she hadn't done any photo's of this type? It is a disqualifying factor, and she would not have been allowed to be in the contest if they had known before hand of these photo's.

She posed naked as a teenager. She lied to get into the competition, AND she got a boob job. I thought she was supposed to be all about the "Christian" viewpoint. Last I heard, fake boobs nude pictures and lying was a big deal. But it's ok when Christians do wrong, cause they have automatic forgiveness, but when anyone else does it they are going to hell.

She seems less Christian each and every day. When and what will be the next shoe to drop? More naked shots like the one's Vanessa Williams took? "Artsy", yea that's the excuse.
On May 5th 2009, Steve wrote:

Get a grip people. The pictures are no worse than anything you see in a Victoria Secrets cagalogue.
On May 5th 2009, Mike wrote:

For anyone out there that says this Girl was wrong for what she said, your FREAKIN RETARDED. You ever heard of Freedom of Speech. Just cuz that papparazi faggot or whatever he is got upset, tough shit.

Miss California was right on. The woman that are pissed are just jealous because you cant look like her….
On May 5th 2009, Christopher Butler wrote:

Boy, the media becomes very aggressive about digging dirt on someone if they don't conform to the politically correct liberal agenda……..That's what the media does to her, to conservative politicians and to any citizen who challenges a liberal politician in public (Joe the Plumber).

It's not like these were fully topless photos-A LOT of aspiring models pose for these kinds of photos….This is NOTHING that you don't already see in Sports Illustrated.
On May 5th 2009, RK Wright wrote:

On May 4th 2009, Steve wrote:

“Keeping your clothes on doesn’t require perfection, just self-respect.”

It was a picture! And what is wrong with the human body? After GOD created it.

Ummm, Steve, according to biblical standards, women being nude for public consumption is wrong and a major sin. Christians used to stone women for less than this. So many of you willing to make excuses for and excuse those who hold YOUR view, but anyone else, damn them. In a CIVIL Society, your religious views are not supposed to dictate law. Everyone is supposed to be treated equally. But then again, Christians now believe torture is ok, and that War is fine too. Shows just how far from Christ's example you all have strayed.

Just remember "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." and really think about that one, would you want to be treated the way you treat gay people? Or the way you treat liberals? I'm sure you'll answer that honestly now…
On May 5th 2009, danny trek wrote:

Big deal, the butt rammers will have a field day commending her just because her opinion is different.

I could care less about gay marriage but it seems to me that the gay playbook is to destroy anybody who doesn't agree with them.

Does anyone know the history of Aids?
On May 5th 2009, player4256 wrote:

You blog and the rest of the left wing is baffling. Nudists make up a portion of the left wing belief and yet you use it to bash someone here who you claim isn't perfect. She never tried to say she was perfect, you assumed she thought of herself that way. Just because she said something you dont agree with you go out on a witch hunt to dig up every dirty little thing you can about her. Guess we also learned that little trick from political left wing extremists huh? If someone is voicing a opinion more popular then yours, even if yours is wrong it will sound more right as long as you throw mud on the other to make them look more unpleasent. Typical liberal hypocritical views. Of course we should let people embrace nudist values but lets turn it into a bad thing if someone does a photoshoot about it. I have heard the same thing on abortion, welfare, most of the things the liberal minded individuals and media try to up because its their opinion for that 15 minutes. So tell me, why should I stop believing in someone who lets is a hypocrite and talks about having morals for a group of people who just admits they have no morals at all and are even willing to turn their own opinions into bad ideas just to sling some mud at someone else?
On May 5th 2009, Janes wrote:

Shocking. Another hypocrite bible thumper and all the other hyprocrite bible thumpers who all the sudden thinking nude shots are beautiful and a Christian thing to do.

Can't wait for her porn film to break so I can see the sheep baahhing to defend that too lol.

So typical.
On May 5th 2009, Guest wrote:

Since when is taking topless photos a sin?
On May 5th 2009, steve wrote:

ah, yes. such an upstanding jesus-like girl. i'm sure jesus smiles upon her fake tits and come-fuck-me photos. she's a true christian and a role model for all! you idiot "christians" sure pick fucked up role models. mnaybe she'll do a porno with "joe" the "plumber".
On May 5th 2009, player4256 wrote:

We picked up some messed up role models? Should we just pick the people who's motto is just anything goes? Hey lets just pick boy toucher Micheal Jackson as our spokeperson.
On May 5th 2009, paul wrote:

What in the world do photos, with or without clothes, have to do with her taking a position on marriage. I think it is ridiculous to view the both events as being similar. She took a stance on marriage which she believes should be between a man and a women. She decided to do a photo opt without a top. She is an attractive model that gets paid to attract people to an advertisement not a commitment to love honor and obey till death do you part.
On May 5th 2009, No one is born homos wrote:

You can't find a homosexual hormone, enzyme, allele sequence or protein. They don't exist.

Why should we give rights to people based on their decision to do something different with their genitals? Should the guy who lets 50 gays bugger him get even more rights than a gay who gets buggered by three homosexuals or a heterosexual who is monogomous???

I don't care where you put a penis in someone else, or where they put it in you. That makes no difference. We all have rughts as women to marry men or as men to marry women. All rights are fair and equal as they are.
On May 5th 2009, me wrote:

i'm so proud to live in a country where you can choose traditional stupidity or other stupidity
On May 5th 2009, Royce wrote:

Wow. The gays are really slamming this girl. Hum, I can't figure out how sticking a penis into some guys butt is so the-in-thing while saying you believe marriage is between and man and woman is such a bad thing. Seems like the World has gone to shit.
On May 5th 2009, No one is born homos wrote:

All gay men have the same rights as any man. They can marry one woman. We are equal.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/x32x0w6568690…

And. look at that. They aren't born gay, as the old lie has always described.

We don't grant Rights based on an abnormal activity.
On May 5th 2009, miki wrote:

She was a teenager in those photos. She might not even have been a Christian then, or might have been rebelling. Judge not…
On May 5th 2009, John wrote:

Funny how all these pro-gay marriage commenters are quick to point how those of us who are against it are telling them how to live and think, but forget that they are telling us to change how to live and think to accomodate their views on marriage.
On May 5th 2009, Matt wrote:

What a joke this is, they are clearly a photo op, and guess what Christians are only sinners saved by grace, but still sinners. No one ever said she was not a sinner, just that she opposed gay marriage, kudos to her and shame on the smear machine.
On May 5th 2009, Sandra wrote:

I'm a christian and a lesbian. I've been with my partner for 13 yrs. I'm also 25yrs old. I know what the bible says and I also know that no where in there does it state that only straight couples can be happy. I don't agree with what she said and she shouldn't have hidden behind her beliefs with her opinion. If she wants to take nude photos because it makes her happy, why can't I be happy? Food for thought. The Bible is just basic instructions before leaving earth. I think there is room for compromise/improvement due to the ever changing world.
On May 5th 2009, Cricket wrote:

I've seen women wear less on a beach ,as well as men too, who really cares what she wears. oh by the way the pink panties if i had her body id wear them to. and as for judging her , well if you dont want a perosn;s opinion then why ask. they knew it was a can of worms when they asked that question. To me it was a loaded question and shouldnt have never been asked.
On May 5th 2009, Tom wrote:

It's OK to have gay marriages and sex contrary to the bible but not OK to take your top off fof a photo? News flash, there are topless and nude beaches all over the world
On May 5th 2009, Bill Barclay wrote:

Get OVER it GAY people. The pictures she's in now showing on the internet, are LESS revealing than any photo shoot of any model on or in any magazine you pick up. You want everyone to be tollerant of your life style, but don't respect any other opinions. GET A REAL LIFE ! !
On May 5th 2009, bryan gestner wrote:

these homosexuals are going too far now .hey lets all just become cock suckers and the world will be a better place. die fags and lesbo infiltrators you are all worse than the taliban. your gay adventures are one reason they hate americans
On May 5th 2009, jeremy wrote:

Listen you f@@gs, get out from behind yer boyfriend and get a "real" life
On May 5th 2009, Bill wrote:

I think it's disgusting how petty and hypocritical you people are trying to drag this girl through the mud. She didn't volunteer her opinion,she was asked to answer a question and gave an honest answer. Tough shit if you don't like it.
On May 5th 2009, Sandra wrote:

Someone PLEASE tell me where marrying your dog falls into category with 2 consenting adults wanting to be joined in mariage til death do them part? Anyone? Right cuz it don't. The people who state things like that shows just how uninformed they are. Sit down with a homosexual in a long term relationship sometime and they'll tell you WE are no different. We just want to be happy.
On May 5th 2009, John wrote:

This whole 'gays are ruining marriage' debate is actually quite funny.

After years of watching people, friends and famous persons alike, disregard their marriage vows and mess around with adultery, it's gays who are ruining marriage?

Someone like Liz Taylor gets married and divorced a dozen times, but gays are ruining marriage?

Britney Spears gets married and has it annulled over a weekend, but it's gays ruining marriage?

Wake up, you don't NEED gays to ruin marriage, married people have been doing just fine at mocking the institution for a very long time now.
On May 5th 2009, wisened up believer wrote:

What it finally comes down to is this. Everytime someone stands up to the gay lobby they get smeared in the press. Well not this time! The gays are finally being outed for real – they hate not us! I think people, err christian believers are finally waking up to this heterophobic attack routine. This girl should be lauded for her courage, employed by christian organizations as a motivational speaker, and write a book. Perez' mom and dad should be ashamed of him!
On May 5th 2009, mangalore wrote:

It's not her pageant answer nor her stripper photos that condemns her. It's the unbridled and arrogant hypocrisy of wrapping herself in the cloth of religiousity to make a buck and then 'stripping' off that religiosity to make another buck. Conservative Christians will do, say and screw anything to promote their hypocrisy. That they lure hapless individuals into their cult under the guise of 'morality' is merely a bonus in their feeble minds.
On May 5th 2009, Hunter wrote:

During an Aug. 16 faith forum held by prominent evangelical Rev. Rick Warren, (now President) Obama defined marriage as "a union between a man and woman." The news media has shown the video of this.

Why then is this young lady being targeted for her beliefs? The gay community doesn't want equality…they want to destroy anything institutionally that they disagree with. The capacity to "hate" is not singularly held by any political party or group of individuals. A storm is brewing…..
On May 5th 2009, King Kong wrote:

I'm very proud of Carrie Prejean. Like it or not, she is welcome to express her personal views just as those of you posting comments.

Agree with her or no, I will defend her right to speak her mind without retribution. Just as I do with proponents of gay marriage.
On May 5th 2009, Pucker up boys! wrote:

Oh my? What next! Now that the homosexuals are saying her "bareback" sins are worse than their sins, when will this all stop? Crazy, at least we can now discuss the lesser of sins and how it doesn't matter… sin is sin and homosexual marriage, (which by their own definition doesn't include sex or religion) is not the same as heterosexual marriage? Maybe one day we can care about how 90% of homosexual couples never have children but want the same tax breaks as 90%
On May 5th 2009, That wrote:

Some body says "A blond stupid bimbo ,the face of the Republican party. This is stupid . I'm pretty certain she's not the face of the Republicans, You must have thought this story was about Nancy Pelosie And gotten your parties wrong.
On May 5th 2009, Omar wrote:

wtf, why is everybody talking about gay marriage and miss CALIFORNIA? its miss usa that said that, i can care less about these girls but not knowing the facts? wtf
On May 5th 2009, Charley Kane wrote:

This is ludicrous – if i wanted this kind of political claptrap i would go to fox or kos. Bye.
On May 5th 2009, Nik wrote:

"I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God." (1 Timothy 2:9)

God (yes, in vain), you "Christians" are so incredibly ignorant and even more hypocritical. The Bible (or more specifically the New Testament) is for Christians to abide by. If people choose not to worship by the dogma set out by your religion that is the complete end of the story. Marriage isn't even an important aspect of Christianity (1 Corinthians 7) and its "sanctity" is just some figment of bigot imagination.

We are not, no matter what you think, a Christian nation. Our founding fathers were deists (look it up, I know you're not familiar with the belief), not Christians. Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli (which, because it's a treaty, is law) specifically states we are not a nation founded upon the ideals of any religion. I call about all "Christian conservatives" to read James Madison and, more importantly, Thomas Jefferson's opinion on religion and its roll in society and politics. But I do concede that it would require an open mind, a property that most Christians today do not exhibit.
On May 5th 2009, Alan wrote:

For her age group, she is IGNORANT regarding gay marriage. Christians in the past have been against inter-racial marriage, women having an equal role int he household etc. Christianity has nothing to do with it. She's just ignorant. The nation continues to progress to freedom and equality to 100% of all people and gays are the last class to receive equal rights. Of course, the South is 20 to 30 years behind the time along with Miss California.
On May 5th 2009, hh wrote:

A bare picture seems less like a sin than stickin it in some dude.lol
On May 5th 2009, Brother Timothy wrote:

She looks like the wholesome Christian woman I could fall in love with.
On May 5th 2009, Bubba wrote:

Nobody perfect.

I am not against gay marriages.

However, people should give Miss California credit which at least she was honest with her anwser. Keep attacking her is not a solution.
On May 5th 2009, Winston Smith wrote:

It's amazing to see how low The Party will sink to discredit anyone who dares to question the glory and the majesty of it's beautiful beautiful ideology.

I would happily embrace every one of you chortling about 'hypocrisy' and posting hate messages being genocided.
On May 5th 2009, Gary wrote:

Sorry folks, you have no "smoking gun" here.

Tastefully done, photos have no bearing on her honestly given answer in the contest. No "glass house" and she threw no stones. The pitiful hateful tirades from the community in question do indeed smack of stone throwing. She made no attempt to destroy anyone. She gave an honest answer to a really silly question from an extremely vitriolic, nasty little being who used the event to reveal his cotempt for straight women .

BTW she is beautiful and to many of us is the real winner.
On May 5th 2009, Shelley Lee wrote:

It is time for the Sate to ask for her to return the crown and resign the title. Not because of her belief's, but because she is doing the State more HARM than GOOD. An argument can also be made that she won a portion of votes due to FRAUD. Instead of speaking so loudly (and Nationally) about her 'mission as Miss California', we now know that was a rues to help her win so she could get on her TRUE soap-box…prejudice.
On May 5th 2009, rositadr wrote:

If they take her crown away, are they gonna take her boobs away too?
On May 5th 2009, cody johnson wrote:

GO Carrie!!

Stop the Gays from ruining the country!!
On May 5th 2009, cody johnson wrote:

Queers need to go make their own civil unions and leave marriage alone. If they want to get married, do it right.. don't try to change it.

it's offensive to me to try to have to explain to my kids why 2 guys are kissing each other. It's clearly not natural, not christian, and not american.
On May 5th 2009, TheTruthSquad wrote:

Incredible. This is NOT a nude or topless photo. It's clear now that there's a vast left-wing conspiracy to destroy this woman simply because she won't think and say what the "politically correct" folks want. Freedom of thought and freedom of expression used to be highly valued and protected in our society. Now people are punished for thoughts which do not meet or square with what the ultra-liberals think. This is certainly not "change we can believe in".
On May 5th 2009, Sandra wrote:

Hey John. I NEVER asked you to like or agree with my beliefs. Besides when did the right to get married change from exactly that a RIGHT as a God believing, tax paying, working, USA supporting AMERICAN to a belief. If you don't like it fine. Thats your right, just like it is this woman in question but don't deny me something I have EVERY right too because you don't like it. I have several straight friends and I'm the only lesbian in my well over 100 family so don't you dare sit there and judge me by saying I hate hetrosexuals. Any of you! I'm no bigot or hater of ANYONE. And finally guess what?? Contrary to popular belief we don't want the whole world to be gay. We like people just the way they are. Thank You.
On May 5th 2009, Dan Marco wrote:

I love how all you pro-homosexuals push for "tolerance and respect" as long as it supports your views but you'll be damned if you offer any tolerance or respect to normal people. (And yes, i do mean to say homosexuals are abnormal.)

Now bring on the hate oh-so-more-enlightened- and-tolerant liberals…
On May 5th 2009, cakerins wrote:

For those of you (including Castina) who has "a problem with anyone who uses the word of God to justify homophobia" needs to open the Bible and look in Leviticus and Romans and discover just exactly what it says about Homosexuality. I don't agree with Prejeans pics…but I do believe the Bible is the Word of God. Don't comment on this until you read if for yourself.
On May 5th 2009, marjo wrote:

Just checked the U.S. Constitution. Nothing about marriage between same sexes being protected right. Federalist Letters, same. Indeed, nothing in any writings from our forefathers in that regard. Bill of Rights – ditto. I'm quite certain that homosexuality has been around for thousands of years, and it existed at the time this country was created. Clearly, same sex marriage is not a founding principle of this country.

As for the girl, simply leave her alone. Intolerance seen by a refusal to disagree but still respect her opinion. She should be applauded for standing by her convictions, even in such a high pressure/profile event where lying and saying the PC line woud have won her the crown.
On May 5th 2009, Joe wrote:

Funny how liberals have no problem with blacks, gays, homophobes, etc, unless they disagree with them politically. in fact, if you disagree with them they will use racists, sexists, homophobic names to punish you…GROW UP ALREADY, GEEZ!

these women are in a beauty pagent where they parade around in bikini's, who cares if they do modeling which may be revealing. everyone of you who are hating will look at every nude women you can.
On May 5th 2009, John The Non-Baptist wrote:

I think she looks great.

She never said she "hated gays" or anything of the sort. All you stupid people being led around by the nose while you get all riled up about her OPINION being expressed are going to be pushing for her to be punished until the government you are so fond of growing and worshipping starts CENSORING YOU TOO.

What a beautiful girl. Unquestionably.

If she said "EVERYBODY OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO GET MARRIED!!" She'd be Miss USA right now and you'd all be thrilled to death. Read your constitution you dummies.
On May 5th 2009, Doug the Atheist wrote:

it is truly amazing how people will criticize someone else for stating their opinion or joining a group that is for their cause when you all use these stupid blogs and posts to do just the same thing. i don't care who or what you sleep with (as long as its consensual), but seriously, shut up and just live your life. get over it and get over yourselves
On May 5th 2009, Jason Majercik wrote:

Am I the only one who realizes that this woman NEVER SAID she was against gays. It's kind of like how when a white woman who doesn't suffer from a low self-esteem tells a black guy no she won't allow him to have anal sex with her (so he can act out his own gay fantasy) she is accused of being a racist.

How does B follow A on that one?

She just believes what people have always believed, a marriage should be a man and a woman. She doesn't say she hates gays just because she doesn't want to mar the definition of marriage. Maybe she hates crackpot radical left wing nutjobs who are helping to bring this country to its very foundation….but what adult with an IQ larger than their shoe size doesn't dislike them?
On May 5th 2009, Chance wrote:

I love it! Modern "feminists" again reveal themselves to be nothing more than henchmen for the left. Carrie never chastised anyone, she stated her opinion against gay marriage. Not one "feminist" or "liberal" has stood up for her right to express her opinion. Instead, she has been endlessly attacked on the completely unrelated topic of her breast implants and now some nude photos. What does her posing nude have to do with her support of a traditional marriage. As always, when the left can't attack on substance, they resort to name calling. Sara Elizabeth wrote "I hate her" really? That's awesome!
On May 5th 2009, mark greenfield wrote:

no t or a rather boring
On May 5th 2009, TiredOfGayHate wrote:

The liberal left (including gay's) have used their political correctness to push through their hate towards anyone that doesn't agree with their (warpped) values. Bigot seems to be their favorite word yet they themselves are bigots. People on the left are the most HATEFUL people in this country these days. Complain about her answer yet give a pass to someone calling her all kinds of names. This just shows you how far down this country hads fallen and IS falling.
On May 5th 2009, Tom Jones wrote:

Homosexuals are sinners. But hey, we are all sinners right? Personally, I don't care if homosexuals eventually receive the ability to marry. Just because man makes a law, it doesn't mean it trumps Gods laws. They can buttfuck each other until their asses are sore. Just leave the state out of religion.
On May 5th 2009, Joel wrote:

This is a tough issue because I think people have grown to accept homosexuality as normal and even the idea of it being a union or institution of marriage.

Clearly we were designed as human beings to be joined and reproduce with the opposite gender. Unlike animals which will seek after opposite sex relationships to reproduce, we as humans are given a choice to make decisions regarding what things we will traffic in that are not conducive with how we were designed.

Homosexuality like adultery and other forms of desires which are not moral, disrespects the institution of the family and the design we have come to know of this institution for centuries. Men can not reproduce with men and women can not reproduce with women and clearly every study I have read has shown children benefit so much more from having a mother and father and genetic makeup from both. This family design will always have a greater impact on society as a whole. For those with families living in this country trying to raise their children and desire them to be exposed to an environment upholding family values and the design of how we are created as human beings, it's difficult to smile and accept the degradation of the family through divorce and homesexuality.

Because if you continue to degrade the family institution, eventually our society will have no family values to look to. Divorce and homesexuality with rampid and anyone who has come from a healthy family is not going to support or agree that this behavior is adding value to our society.

We live in a free country and I have no issue personally with people who traffic in homesexuality or drugs or sexual adulterous behavior or other habbitual forms.

Unlike animals we have a will and will experiment in so many things particularly things out of our design. I guarantee you that the more you traffic in the behavior, you will become an addict of that lifestyle.

Heterosexual relationships are the same. Human nature trafficking in a relationship that begins when the male and females explore a mental physical and eventually sexual relationship. As children and most the time as adolescence we have no clue of those relationships until traffic in them.

My point is Humans will adapt and crave the behavior they put before them if it's pleasurable.

The majority of people currently in our country respect the institution of family values because they are presented at young age with a mother and father sisters and brothers who are related both genetically and through an incredible family bond between a mother father who love them. Mentally they know this is the best form for life to continue for generations.

Others will know this but experiment and when they do they become addicts of a different type of behavior which will include homosexuality, drug abuse and other pleasurable forms. These institutions do not produce generations of family value normalcy as we were designed. Family values are lost and children and future generations are affected in a negative way. Human nature will crave these abnormal behaviors because when you traffic in human pleasure you will have an affinity for it.

Children need a loving mother and father and sisters and brothers and to grow up in healthy home environment.

Divorce, homosexual relationships, drug addictions and the like, degrade the design of a healthy family unit which is the optimal design for a society to attain.

Unfortunately in this life pleasure has and will override doing what is morally right.

Society is affected by this behavior because our children will benefit from examples that promote family values.

Kids scarred by drug abuse or alcohol abuse by a parent, greatly miss having a mother or father and healthy family life with siblings, which a homosexual relationship can not provide and leave a child confused on what the ideal design for a healthy family should be.

And this is why those who oppose gay marriage speak out because they know these lifestyles will degrade the ideal family we should be striving to as a country as blessed as ours.

If you look at history one of the main criteria for a society and nation being destroyed is when family values don't exist.

If Men and Men or Women and Women could produce children and provide the emotional support and direction that both and mother and father provide in nurturing and raising children, if drug addicted mothers and father's were healthy role models for children, if divorce didn't affect children and destroy the sanctity of marriage, then family values would not be affected and these issues would not be debated as strongly by the norm of society.

The government should not reward any behavior that degrades the family and work to encourage family values and protect our families.

You hate everything I saying here but when you screw around with the family everyone suffers in the end.

Kind of like running a car on gas that has been tainted with water. It will run but not like it was designed.

Truly, we have designer. Anyone who believes this world just coincidently came together is stating as silly as saying the White House erected coincidently. There were designers behind the White House as is evident when we walk up to it and walk within it, just like there was a designer for this world.

There is evidence throughout this world that there was a designer placed things into play. Yes you can go against that designs and make changes but the design will not function or will not function optimally as it was designed.

There is nothing wrong with people who are like Ms. California who want our society to promote the most successful design possible.

There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with this but at least acknowledgment they are presenting an educated argument.

If you can't do that, your kind like the people who laughed at Columbus because he had scientific evidence that indicated the earth was round. Think where we would be if he didn't go through with that evidence.

There is a lot of evidence that the continuation of family values being eroded away by the pleasure of society are going to only cause more harm to our society as it has already in generations to come. Those who take issue with that need to take issue with our designer and not with those of us who are making observations on where our society is quickly going and the family values that are disappearing rapidly.
On May 5th 2009, Bob wrote:

What is the big deal. This isn't semi-nude. You can see more on Dancing with the Stars.
On May 5th 2009, David wrote:

Why do people worry so much of the speck of dust in their neighbors eye when they have a plank in theirs. People please…Find something else to do with your time than to knock down other people..
On May 5th 2009, Putrid Following wrote:

I love how all these Bible scholars pop out of the wood work all of a sudden. Bet you even had to google for the verse with the same keyboard you googled "topless prejean". Such a joke. The world cares less about your opinions than you do about her opinions. How’s it feel to know that her soapbox is bigger than yours… that the very substance of your hate comment is based off of her hate comments? Ironic and funny. Hope you enjoyed your pitiful moment as much as I did.
On May 5th 2009, Mike Tomlin wrote:

Honestly, these public postings are even scarier than the facists who use their poltical affliations to denounce other human beings. I'm a Republican who supports gay marriage. Don't worry, it's my own party's fault for losing their sense of humanity and the primary reason I voted for Obama. The second reason, jerks who write obscene posts in the name of conservatism. This isn't the Inquisition guys, sorry. And, finally, learn how to write a coherent sentence before you call someone "ignorant." You're only making fools of yourselves.

Don't you people realize that this vitriol between us, right vs. left, is the reason we're falling apart. Or would you rather continue to hate our differences as we fall faster than Rome?
On May 5th 2009, Dilip wrote:

Oh come on ! You libs are so lame ! There is nothing to this picture. Liberal females have bared more than this on magazine covers.
On May 5th 2009, Riley wrote:

Gays are stupid CUNTS and should all shut the hell up
On May 5th 2009, Robert wrote:

1. Another website said there were worse photos than this, they just can't post them. So, if you think this pic is tame, blame your censors for preventing you from seeing more.

2. There's no proof that "the gays" leaked this. Who took the photo? Probably a straight guy. This probably leaked for $$$. Most of the posters here are not smart enough to think rationally.
On May 5th 2009, WittyTwister wrote:

Too bad the U.S. isn’t more like iran.
Nuff “said”…………
On May 5th 2009, Dave wrote:

It is always amazing to me how intolerant "Liberals" really are. You can do anything you want in a "Liberal" world, EXCEPT have an opinion different than theirs.

Most of the people commenting in this blog fall into the category of hatemongors in my mind. Attacking the woman for saying what she believes.
On May 5th 2009, Jon wrote:

Anyone ever wonder what God would look like naked? Or Jesus or Mary for that matter and is it such a big deal? Why are humans born naked and not with thick masses of hair – people make such a big deal of nudity and christianity – I hope the christians and other similar cults close their eyes when they're copulating with each other. So many hypocrits out there – I'll bet there are hundreds of thousands of people out there who think the pope doesn't have erections and wet dreams. Get a cluee people – that's life. If Perez wants to be a faggot – so be it. That's "her" choice and so long all involved are happy and willing, who cares. By the way, where can one get a license to marry monkey?
On May 5th 2009, Troy wrote:

Ummmmmmmmmmm………. Folks, she was asked a question and gave her opinion which was asked of her. Your opinions are just as nasty as hers. Why you ask, why is one OPINION more valuable than another's? If you don't want ones opinion, don't ask. DUH!
On May 5th 2009, John The Non-Baptist wrote:

Be open-minded!! THINK LIKE US!!

Bible-bashing athiest types love this kind of thing. It's a great way for them to "come out of the woodwork" (their term, on this page, many times) and finally be able to "punish" those who they THINK are making them feel like they're freaks or something.

Bottom line? This girl was in a beauty contest. She gave her opinion. You disagreed with it. Now you're all freaked out because somebody DARED TO SPEAK THEIR MIND when it wasn't what you wanted to hear.

Welcome to America gay people . . . Here, we get freedom of speech. Get used to it.
On May 5th 2009, David wrote:

Miss California is my hero!!!!! You guys have been twisted by the torn social fabric that we once knew as the U S A. I wish all the cows,chickens and fish would go gay too, so you would understand the repercussions of seeing "Gay" as ok. Since the dawn of time, marriage has existed between Adam and Eve, not Adam and Adam. I am aware that people are born with hormonal differences or irregularities, and I truly support their plight. My heart goes out to their struggle, and I do not judge sexual preferences, or am I homophobic, but stop shoving your gay marriage ideas and rights down our throats. This is what a "Power of Attorney" was created for, to protect personal interests. That's all this is, personal interests. Miss California Rocks!!!!!! Love the new pics too!!!!!!!! Imagine being crucified for speaking your mind in the good ole USA. What'll happen next gay people sponsering the Miss/Mr Gay pafeant of USA on ABC, and being crucified for being against traditional Man/Woman Marriages>>>?????? Tweakers, get a grip!
On May 5th 2009, John The Non-Baptist wrote:

By the way . . . at the top of this page, this thread is being characterized as "NSFW" (not safe for work) and "pornstars".

This woman speaks her mind and is now being referred to as a "porn star".

These liberal hacks need to take another look at their Hustler collection if they think this photograph is "porn". Unbeliveable.

"Do and say what you do and say, and we'll hate you for it" . . . . but if you DO AND SAY WHAT WE DO AND SAY . . .WE'LL HATE YOU FOR IT THEN TOO.

This is the position of the Anti-capitalist, pro-collective-ism, anti-FREEDOM, pro-Government, anti-Individualism crowd.

The good news is, the country was foolish enough to put them in charge. They had no choice really, because the other guys weren't doing good either . . . but they're going to fail so hard that Jimmy Carter is gonna seem like Aberham Lincoln by comparrison.
On May 5th 2009, Big W wrote:

Typical liberals, someone disagrees with you, just destroy them. These tactics have been used by hitler and his bunch and the communist. I think you guys are way better at destroying people then the commies.

You use your lackeys in the mainstream press to do your dirty work. Just remember, what goes around comes around. I just hope one day in my life time the dumbed down American population wakes up an comes down on your heads.
On May 5th 2009, Jack wrote:

WOW…first of all, I'm straight down the middle politically. I am a Christian, and in all reality, no one will like what I have to say. No Miss California is wrong to have taken the pics that she did. Next, the boob job, sorry to those of you that think that is a sin, its not. In our Christian beliefs, being gay is wrong, sinful, or as the bible states: not natural.

No I don't go out and bash those that are gay. Period….I have family and friends that are gay, they know how I feel, and I know how they feel. I don't have to live their lifestyle, and they don;t live mine. But for those who choose to bash those of us that are not gay, all I hear is that we should treat you as we want treated. Well maybe you should listen to yourselves.

As for Miss California, she stated her beliefs, thats all it is. Her beliefs, and I'm glad she did. She didn't take the easy way out. No she shouldn't have taken the pics, that was stupid and foolish. Not the way a woman should have treated her body.

Now for those who chastise her, have you done anything as foolish as her? Probably so. As for her joining up and representating that group, well that's her choice, why worry about it. I'm straight, do you think I worry about who joins up and represents a gay group? Nope I sure don't. I have more to worry about with my family, then to worry about her, or another group.

I can only think that some of you are a bit insecure about yourself, your beliefs so you feel like you have to attack others for their beliefs. Just my thoughts and opinions.
On May 5th 2009, Ken wrote:

I'm a Christian and am confused by Carrie Prejean. On the one hand I support her un-eloquent answer and her right to express her view not a PC view. I also agree that biblically marriage is a "religious" institution ordained by God between one man and one woman. Where are all the "seperation of church and state" types who always oppose the state doing anything promoting religion. Marriage IS religious, just have your civil unions and the rights afforded and be done with the religious aspect of it. Romans chapter one talks about same sex as wrong in the eyes of God. Yet so is lying, stealing or hetero's infidelity which is rampant even in the church! I'm against it all and don't consider any one worse than the other. Without judging her faith… I have little respect for Carrie Prejean as a so called Christian…many of you are correct…the bible calls for modesty and she by no means exhibits Christian modesty. Bad example.
On May 6th 2009, yhu wrote:

Perez's comments were great, perfect timing, perfect place to make them he singlehandedly demostrated what a whining, self loathing childish, self absorbed weirdo he is and the majority of his ilk really are. Society is expected to treat gays like anyone else and put up with the droning on and on about thier "lifestyle" as normal. But when a differing opinion arrives the ugly reality is aired out. Accept gays without question but if you disagree we'll berate and scream until we get our way. Crawl back under your rocks.
On May 6th 2009, T. Norwood wrote:

CARRIE WAS VERY ELOQUENT!!!

She made me proud as a Christian Man,

who believes salvation comes only through Jesus Christ!
On May 6th 2009, T. Norwood wrote:

Homosexuality is a mental illness, not a lifestyle!
On May 6th 2009, T. Norwood wrote:

"Leviticus 18:22"

What GOD said about the subject!
On May 6th 2009, Steve wrote:

It's a nice picture. Grow up people.

The picture has no relationship to her stand on Gay marriage.
On May 6th 2009, phil wrote:

she is really not that hot, I would agree with the answer she gave about gays but she is also a complete moron, her answer was dumb blonde like, much like any other contestant on that show. IM amazed that these are the role models we set for our kids. Be dumb and smart and you will hit the big time. As for the gay lesbian rights thing, they dont deserve equal rights, because marriage should only be between a man and a woman. Why? Because thats what it was meant to be, if a man could impregnate another man Id say go ahead, but apartnetly the penis is supposed to enter a vagina according to our evolution. Go find something else to bitch about homos, or move to Denmark and get married where it is legal, cry babies.
On May 6th 2009, USI GUY wrote:

I don't see how this so called Partial nude picture is that bad. I mean sure she doesn't have clothes on, but you really can not see anything, and how is that so different from the skimpy swimsuit and dresses that they wear. I mean you can almost seem the naked in there bikini's anyway. So, just stop attacking her. Marriage is only between a man and a woman, is what I believe. Go Miss California.!!!!!!!
On May 6th 2009, R. O. Davis wrote:

I can understand why some are in a hysterical tiff caused by her revealing pose. It makes it easy to seperate separate a real female from an impostor.
On May 6th 2009, Eyeman wrote:

The problem here is that anyone attacking Carrie Prejean is either jealous of her physical beauty and or is a pathetic disturbed atheist hung up on other peoples belief. I applaud Ms California for standing up for her beliefs and her self image even though those pictures have surfaced which are a pitiful attempt to discredit her. She's in the business of selling visually and semi-nude photos will sell any products. Nude pictures will sell anything…you have to draw the line somewhere! But just as i am in the liberal arts business and I deal with Gay & Straight people all day long doesn't make me gay or straight? Stop bashing people to make yourselves feel justified you bunch of losers!
On May 6th 2009, John The Non-Baptist wrote:

LET'S GET ONE THING STRAIGHT "KEN" . . . YOU ARE A LIAR AND YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTING YOURSELF FOR WHO YOU ARE. PERIOD.

It's disgusting seeing how far some people will bend over in order to make their CHOICES seem like they have no choice.
On May 6th 2009, anonymous wrote:

The difference between America PR, and European PR are "Breast, and Freedom of expression."

How hypocritical!

So what, if Homosexuals and Beauty Pageants qualm unless, their dispute regulates Freedom of Speech.
On May 6th 2009, Bill wrote:

Taking erotic pictures is not very moral. I wonder how she feels after the fact, since that was done a while back. Ever heard of forgiveness? Maybe she regrets doing that.

I applaud former gays that realized their choice of sin and repented and gave up that way of life. I know many gay people, and they ALL admit it is a choice, and that they could be straight if they wanted to be.

So lets put a few things in perspective here. She is entitled to her oppinion, just as you all are. It does not make her a bigot, and if you really wanted to argue that topic…by definition everyone in the world could be classified as a bigot! Lets get passed the petty name calling and harrassment. Lets use a better term… lets respectfully disagree. God will make the final judgement on all of us!

We all are sinners, even me. I choose to ask for forgiveness and not to fall for temtations. Homosexuality is wrong and is a sin! There is no gay gene, and it is not a civil rights argument. You can try and call my politically incorrect, but you would be wrong…. since politically speaking the country has answered and upheld traditional marriage. So politically correct whould be the argument against homosexuality!

Lets all grow up and act like adults here, and answer for our sins!
On May 6th 2009, rbb333 wrote:

You people are ignorant.

First, why do you have such intolerance toward people who value traditional marriage, especially when they do not judge those who don't!

Second, some of these comments suggest that people can never express their views (i.e., value of traditional marriage) unless they are perfect and never make mistakes. Absolute nonsense. You people need to take a class in logic. If this was the rule, nobody could ever express their values or beliefs.

Finally, Christians do not think they are better than non-Christians, they are sinners, just like everyone else. Christians just believe they are forgiven by accepting the grace of God through Jesus Christ. Does a Christian need to be sinless before he or she is allowed to embrace traditional marriage? You people are intolerant hypocrites. You cry about tolerance, but you won't allow anyone to express their views unless they endorse sodomy.
On May 6th 2009, Trent wrote:

First of all she couldnt mind her own buisness about her opinion of gay marriage. She was asked a direct question and she answered it. She didnt bash gays in ANY way at all, she just said she was raised that marriage is between a man and a women. Its her right as an american to have her own opinion!

As far as the pic whatever that is not semi nude LOL you see more in a bikini then in those pics. If that is semi nude then the bikini contest part of the pageant is semi nude as well!!! I see more watching the contest then I do in that pic!
On May 6th 2009, Sweet 'E" wrote:

So she posed nude who hasn't these days it doesn't take away anything of how she feels about marriage ask any woman who's posed nude some are going to think same sex marriage is ok and others aren't, if she wasn't Miss California it wouldn't be such a big deal the media and perez are the ones making a big deal out of it.She may have to be a role model in your eyes but my role models are in my family and friends.
On May 6th 2009, Sweet 'E" wrote:

God made us naked Adam and EVe screwed it up and for perez that's Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On May 6th 2009, intense one wrote:

Isn't it pathetic how homosexuals are so paranoid about their abnormal status that they will go to any lengths to surround themselves with the trappings of normal society. This is why they so badly want to be able to get "legally" married; so they can act like what they are doing is really normal and just a personal choice. They want to gloss over the fact that their lifestyle is abnormal. I don't really have a problem with their abnormal lifestyle, except I think it's wrong that children are victimized by it, not being able to have the normal male/female role models in their lives, plus all the stigma that goes with having an abnormal homosexual parent relationship. Anyway, homosexuals should be glad to be living in a country where it is tolerated and basically accepted. The homosexual community's strident actions in trying to force normal heterosexuals to embrace it is a real turn off, and it is just creating hostility toward it. Leave sweet Carrie alone (and all of us regular hetero men are so thankful that we won't be losing something that fine to the crack snackers!)

And they better not let that worthless piece of crap Perez Hilton be a judge next year.
On May 6th 2009, b wrote:

It is wrong for a dude to lay with another dude. It would be pretty hard to populate the earth with just two of the same sex. If it is so right to be gay than why do so many people have to cram it down everyone’s throat? Reason being it is not right, that is why they have to keep forcing the issue on everyone. The fall of every great society started its crumble from within. Families units decayed, loss of morals and wide spread immorality ran rampant. I believe our country is on the verge of just that, crumbling from within. I do not embrace the act of homosexuality. It is wrong. Just because no one sin is greater than another does not mean you should do or condone it. Yes we all have our vices but a line has to be drawn somewhere in the sand. People must step up and say I do not like this, if the opposite party doesn’t like it than too bad. I don’t like all the fag crap on TV these days but it is there regardless of how I feel.
On May 6th 2009, mike wrote:

I understand that the homosexual community is angry, when you consider that the person standing against gay marrige is Miss Cal, which is the un-offical leader of pro-gay activism, even though they just lost the vote a couple months back, but if your going to bring the Bible or Jesus Christ into this argument you should know what your talking about, Jesus supports the ultimate inequality, He tells us one day we will be split up, some will live with HIM others will go to live in darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth, HE also tells us that following HIM is the only way, Thank you for your time, please know the Bible before using it against people. :-)
On May 6th 2009, kevin privani wrote:

I feel for her being in the spotlight. I'm christian, but I'm human first. I am happily married but everytime my ex comes around-I bed her. I was her first, I am entitled. If her family gives me the cold shoulder…I screw her hard! I hope God will forgive me and my wife won't find out.
On May 6th 2009, gary wrote:

gays are an abnormal life form,constantly looking for approval…
On May 6th 2009, Txbadboy wrote:

First to say that I agree with the ladies comment, that marriage is an institution between a man and a woman. That is the value that I have, and what I grew up believing in. Just like those that think otherwise, I respect their opinion, as well as they should respect mine. I'm really bothered at all the hate and cheap attacks that are being directed at this young lady, she merely stated her opinion, which last i checked, we are all intitled to have one. Because someone does not share in your opinion is no reason to attack someone as some of the posters here are doing. If the woman took some nude pictures so what. There are very few people in the modeling profession who hasn't. Big deal let it go. To Carrie Prejean, I'd like to say stand tall Ms, there are many of us out here who fully support you.
On May 7th 2009, Stew wrote:

To those that felt the answer she gave was a solid answer, read the question again. She was asked if she believed other states should follow suit in legalizing gay marriage. She answered by giving her opinion on gay marriage. She could have easily answered the question without placing her opinion. The poor girl is still not bright enough to see that. Are you???
On May 7th 2009, Jesus wrote:

I like the pictures of Carrie, I think she is soooo pretty. She has nice tatas. I forgive her. She may sit by my side. Even on my lap;) Jesus has spoken…This is the word of the Lord…(Chorus):Thanks be to God
On May 7th 2009, Moses wrote:

The photos aren't racey in anyway. If y'all think that's any more revealing than most young women at the public beach, I'm afraid you've got some psychological problem about an attractive woman showing nothing in comparison to what's legal on a public beach.

But let's all get real here. Y'all know what this is all about. She attacked the sanctity of homo marriage. That's a big deal to small minded little queers like Perez Hilton. You see you can't disagree with activists because that mean war. The little pecker head Perez Hilton has no boundaries when it comes to his homo agenda.

I'm referring to his Youtube rant about Carrie's answer. Besides his question being irrelevant and stupid, all she gave was her opinion. That's another problem. Perez personally can't take opposing views against homo marriage. I personally can't grasp the thought of homo marriage. This has caused me to take the same opposite position. If homos can't take opposing views, then I can't either. From now on, I'm not accepting the fact that homos are just as normal as heterosexuals.

When I was young, it was considered to be perversion to want to have sex with the same gender. The thought of it personally makes my skin crawl. Why do they need to get married anyway? They can't have children with each other and have a naturally conceived family. Hey if you can't physically have children, then that should tell you something, shouldn't it? I'd like to strangle that little queer Perez Hilton for even asking that stupid question that had nothing to do with the Miss America Pagent. I know this will be considered hate speech. But Perez Hilton's Youtube response is considered normal I suppose. Screw this small minded little queer!
On May 7th 2009, John wrote:

before NOM decided to hold Miss jesus juggs up, as the standard for christian morals, maybe they should have checked to see if she had any nude photos like all the OTHER miss america contestantso couldnt care LESS that she took nude photos (shes not MY daughter) but the hypocracy of it all, reminds me of people like Juliani, and rush, who also defend the "sanctity of marriage" Rudy on his THIRD (one of em his COUSIN) and which marriage is rush on, his FOURTH?..ive lost count. of COURSE its the GAYS ruining the sanctity of marriage!
On May 9th 2009, rennekay wrote:

you can tell she is not a feminist, she looks too damn good!!!!!!

From the looks of her, you know there is a GOD!!!!!
On May 9th 2009, Jess wrote:

So what! She took some partial nude photos. That's all you see in america now anyways, ain't it? They're on magazines in our stores, billboards on our streets, and pretty much any station on TV. I don't care about any of that. But what I can't seem to understand is, U.S citizens have been f**kn up the name of marriage for quite some time now. Everywhere you look there are scandals & fidelity that do not honor marriage. Shit, we have people in our own government dishonoring their vows or their partners. So why the hell do staight people care so much about what others choose to do with their lives? Why is it in our power to determine someone else's future.

I am a straight female who is engaged to a wonderful man. I found happiness in the opposite sex. I have no right to tell someone where they should find their happiness as long as it is not hurting, bringing harm to or affecting me. Which gays & lesbian marriage does not to do anyone!
On May 10th 2009, YisroelFeldman wrote:

Regarding the racy pictures Miss Carrie Prejean had taken of herself when she was 17: Of course, The Lord teaches us that such a scene of a woman is extremely beautiful for her man whom she is married to, but in other places, it is very wrong.

First of all though, these shots were done for a particular lingerie company. So they were probably intended only for "private" like woman's magazines, and NOT, Lord Forbid, to be tossed around the internet!

Second, Carrie herself confesses that she is not perfect. Moreover, the issue is not only with her, for a significant massive number of people throughout the world are extremely far from perfect on this point. Probably most of us — myself included — need to have a really tremendous amount of improvement in this area.

Just look at what the pageant people themselves do at the pageants! There, every year, they take — and show throughout the media — countless photographs and videos of attractive young women who are only wearing itsy-bitsy bikinis. And, as many of the posted comments have noted, most of these pageant two-piece bikini shots are no less racy than Carrie's age 17 one-piece topless ones! And this is fully accepted by, of course, the pageant directors, and by our society!

So the pageant's charges against her about her age 17 pictures are clearly nothing more than the sickest double standard hypocracy!!

Overall, the pageant's charges against her can have nothing to do with the breaking of any moral standards. The pageant directors do not give a hoot about any kind of morality!! They have totally bashed down all morality with their push not only for homosexuality, but for the most extreme degree of homosexuality of homosexual marriage!!

It is completely obvious that the only reason they are making this issue is because they are mad at Carrie for standing up and bringing in a little bit of religion against their homosexual onslaught. So, of course, they are going to dig up and inflate any speck of dirt that they can find on her; if she would have gone through a traffic light, they would use that as a case to expel her!
On May 11th 2009, albert wrote:

A lot of people are upset with her because when asked the question she said marriage should be between a man and a woman. If the question hadn't been asked she probably would never have said anything about the issue. Here is a piece of free advice, IF YOUR AFRAID OF THE ANSWER DON'T ASK THE QUESTION.
On May 11th 2009, xnxnxnxn wrote:

SHAME ON U MISS CARRIE!!!! u so HYPOCRITE!!!! u deserve to be disqualified!!!!u r a shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On May 11th 2009, xnxnxnxn wrote:

u will never be successful after this contreversy…we will never patronage ur future endeavors!~stay at home and drink lots of depression pills…that where u belong! or let ur dad wear ur gowns…!and ur future gay children!
On May 11th 2009, Awesome wrote:

If a guy looked like that…I'd have sex with him.
On May 11th 2009, CommisionerGordon wrote:

Shame? Surely you jest! By today's standards there is nothing at all controversial about these photos. Liberals don't know how really mean-spirited they are. Their comments so often show that they are people filled with hatred.
On May 12th 2009, Zippy Skippy wrote:

Fuck you homo agenda pushing bastards!

She didn't pose nude or semi nude where anything was shown – the supposed "Nude" photos is photoshopped by some commi-nazi wanting to hurt her – I hate you fucking libs with a passion.
On May 12th 2009, Dave wrote:

Those who sin eventually seek redemption if they are to attain true wisdom. Funny how many liberals fail to catch that part. In defending the true nature of marriage, Miss Prejean has indeed begun redeeming herself for any sin this may have qualified as.

Sorry, P.C. liberals, but homosexuality is still an abomination. Marriage is still intended to be a sacred union. You CAN NOT have a sacred abomination!
On May 12th 2009, grace wrote:

Her portfolio that included this picture for her modeling application was meant for the purpose of pursuing her career in commercial fashion. Gays are twisting the context of her belief in God by portraying her half-nude pictures as pornography to feel better about their belief in same-sex marriages. There are only two families you may choose to be a part of. It is a choice: Good or evil. No one is forced to go to heaven.
On May 12th 2009, bobbill wrote:

Forget all the other crap. She had a boob job.

Kinda like MLB player taking steroids. Can't do it on their own. I say take the crown away because she cheated!

What are we teaching our kids?

Only in America
On May 12th 2009, JMan wrote:

The sad thing is that there are just too many damn people who aren't seeing the big picture. She had an opinion, a judge didn't like it (and take into consideration who the P.O.S. was that was judging folks!), and she loves her faith. Big freakin deal! If she went the other way on her decision to please a damn judge, then the same thing would have happened. The judges opinion wouldn't be favorable by many others either, why don't they go after THAT P.O.S. too! But the grown ups will stand back and let the children fight. Freakin morons!
On May 12th 2009, GMAN wrote:

Well I don't understand why people get so defensive when a Christian says what they believe to be truth. First off if you don't believe the Bible to be the inspired words of God there is no need to argue this point, however if you do read Romans 1 and you get your answer. I have never heard such a hypocritical statement , someone saying “ I'm gay and Christian…”

I also see in Genesis, God created Man and Woman to procreate, now how this is possible in alternate lifestyle. If you can convince me that two woman or two men can accomplish this feat without the other then you have this right.
On May 12th 2009, Fred wrote:

Miss Prejean answered a question truthfully. From what I can tell there wasn't a hint of judgementalism in her statement. The bible clearly states that it is sin for a man to lie with a man. Sodom and Gomorrah paid the price for their sin. God is faithful to forgive those who ask. I am sure that by now Carrie has asked God to forgive her for modifying the body He gave her and having immodest pictures taken. I highly doubt any with homosexual tendencies have. It's OK to be homosexual just not to act out on it. God loves us all just not our sins.
On May 12th 2009, FascismForFree wrote:

At this point, noone cares about the bible or any other such made-up nonsense. The fact is, the gays are getting fairly viscious on their crusade for "equal rights", like they are SO oppressed. You guys just need to get over yourselves. The fact that you stick your reproductive organs into an unreceptive hole doesn't make you special, or deserving of anything, in any way. It's getting disgusting.
On May 12th 2009, Ralph wrote:

Quit being so Christian-phobic…
On May 12th 2009, Chuck wrote:

To the Christians that are using words overtly negative words to discribe Miss Prejean, reread your Bible. Jesus said, "he who hath not sin shall cast the first stone." I do believe calling someone a "skank" or a "slut" is considered a sin. So, the next time you feel the need to claim to be better than someone else, open your eyes and take a look in the mirror. People sin, that is just the way it is. Maybe wasting your time commenting on the actions of other is not the best way to spend your time. Reread your Bibles and return to this issue with forgiveness in mind, not judgement. It is not your responsibility to judge others. I believe that task is left up to God if I'm not mistaken.
On May 12th 2009, Subaru WRX wrote:

Wow… All these people who only know what they see on television want to make judgements on Carrie. I happen to know her and i went to school with her. She is a sweet girl and she is certainly not stupid. Grow up people! Anyone in America can say something you might not like, we have been free to do so since this country was founded. Deal with it! That includes Carrie telling an openly gay judge that she disagrees with his opinion politely. All she did was answer his question and this is what happens? Unbelievable . As for her getting breast implants and being dissatisfied with the way God made her… i'm sure if you examine yourself you would find something that makes you even a little self-conscious. And she was preparing to be on a stage in front of the entire nation. Who here that is so bold on his/her computer has ever had to do that? I bet not very many… It's funny how secular people get the idea that Christians think they are perfect. Carrie never claimed to be and of course, is not. That's no reason to slander her all over the internet
On May 13th 2009, Scott wrote:

Ok, man you liberals sure like to talk alot of crap and sure do like judging people. I watched the pagent and thought she answered the question pretty good considering it was a loaded question. Hello, shes from california and we just voted yes on prop 8 to ban gay marrage. She answered honestly and got bashed for it. Id say thats why she singned up with the anti gay people. I would too if they trashed me as well for a setup of a question. And look, most people arent gay bashing because of the marrage issue. It that marrage is a biblical insitution and the bible is against gay relationships. why the hell do they need to try and force themself into a place that doesnt accept them and they dont accept the religious beliefs that there trying to force themselves into. Here in california the gay partners have more rights than a non married man/woman couple. They have all the rights of marrage, they just dont have the word marrage. and why are the gay supportes so against civil unions. It gives them all the leagle rights they scream they want without offending the religious people. id say its a win win. But they want that word marrage reguardless if its the smae damn thing otherwise. Id say its just another way to chip away at religion. Im definately not a gay hater or a homophobe, i just dont agree with them trying to shove it down everyones throat. Its too the point i see the teens in school are thinking its cool to be gay or "Bi" when really there not, its just cool to say you are.
On May 13th 2009, Steve wrote:

Yeeeaaahh. Riiight. Cuz being naked is a sin. Well in this case, partially naked. Um Hum. It is people like you who make irrational parallels like that which are at the root of our problems today. Let her have her opinion. You have yours. It's a beauty contest, not a political debate. Ass. You're jealous because people would actually SAVE pictures of her ass on their hard-drives, and would puke viewing yours.
On May 13th 2009, Subaru WRX wrote:

Who are you talking to steve?
On June 5th 2009, christianhypocritess wrote:

People like Carrie Prejean give christianity a bad name. most muslim women think Christians are sluts because of Christians having one of the highest divorce rates, teenage pregnancies, dating (kissing/smooching/sex before marriage), posing nude.

Look at Jessica Simpson's dad, he was a Church minister and now he's directing nude videos of his own daughter.

The whole western culture is not Chrisitan, it is pagan European. Chrisitanity came from mideast for Christ's sake.
On June 5th 2009, hasan wrote:

There nothing to say about sex of christian community…………………………………….but is ……………..conti………..
On June 10th 2009, Grimlie wrote:

You guys are a trip all this over a opinion. Hey Christains …. Who is suppose to be making the judgements??? Have a Good Day
On June 10th 2009, Avril wrote:

BITCH
On July 25th 2009, Digger wrote:

Alot of people have expressed support for liberal believes and ridiculed conservative beliefs. on morality. What is Moral -Abortion (killing of Unborn). Homosexuals. A disbelief in God, the Bible. (God calls it an abomination).

This nation was founded on Christian beliefs.

Christians have been persecuted since Christ. Today is no different. The Moral fabric of this country is majority christian. You can not be for abortion, and homosexuality and think you are a christian. doesn't work that way. When judgment day comes for all, and the book of life is opened, What will you say to God then. Live your life the way you want too, that is your free choice.

There will always be opposite sides to just about anything and any belief. You know my choice..
On July 28th 2009, you're all hypo wrote:

okay, let me start by saying everyone is a hypocrit. :) be in denial all you want bit its the truth. yes, the girl believes in God. so stop using that as an excuse to attack her. id love to see the perfect person…oh wait, theres not one. the only person that ever did that was Jesus Christ. and so much for freedom of speech. thats all you people complain about and then when a Chritian exercises it they get shot down. and she was asked a question in a beauty pagent, so naturally she's goin to have to answer that question to have a shot at winning. if you didnt like her answer complain about the pagent asking it to her. if anyone's judging its you people that say she shouldnt even care who gets married. but i guess thats what its come to-you guys having nothing better to do but worry about a beauty pagent. liberals are so two-sided. lets say whatever it takes to ruin america. answer me this if yall are so smart: how come abortion is legal but killing a pregnant woman counts as two murders?? see what im saying-hypocrits!?
On January 3rd 2010, Lexi wrote:

umm carrie is actually my cousin. she is on my dads side of the family aand i think she was just having fun as a kid and my dads side of the family is very relegious thats why she doesnt support gay people she made my family roud for standing up what she believes in. everyone makes mistakes
On May 5th 2010, zafer ali wrote:

HELLO,

our MURSHAD is a human of Super power..he has spiritual power,
they have 7Ghosts.All ghost are working on his hand by oder.if you have
or you know any place as HOME,LAND,FARM and you know there are gosts
or you want to replace them from the houses then This is our Challenge that
Our Murshad witll replace them from ghosts.you can use that place again,for more
information contect us…
E.MAIL..( [email protected])
NOTE( Our murshad will Display you ghosts)
On May 10th 2010, bobby wrote:

its ok.
On July 10th 2010, Madison wrote:

“The way she has been treated is utterly deplorable and has only shown me and the rest of the world what INTOLERANT BIGOTS the homosexuals are. Wow. They are childish, arrogant brats who are obsessed with themselves (and their sex lives) and who are competely egotistical and narcissistic. It’s been real eye opening the past month watching them be the gross children that they are.”

@Sarah – This is a disgusting and shameful generalization of homosexuals. I can’t even believe anyone could be so ignorant.
On July 14th 2010, scrapbooking ideas wrote:

nice and sexy photo….!!!
On March 2nd 2011, Tyler wrote:

Will you gay activists stop comparing yourselves to racism victims. NOBODY in this century has ever subject you personally slavery, or physical abuse on a level that the african american community or the irish or other various groups have. In fact this is about money. I would be less pissed off if you would admit that, in fact you might have better luck arguing that point in this economy. Meanwhile, a year ago violence and aggression dominated WHICH sect of this whole debate? ummmm maybe we don’t wanna mention that such acts we being done by selfish people. NOTICE i didn’t say gay. Why? Because at that moment you weren’t acting gay, you were acting pretty selfish. A society has a right to shun those groups they consider indecent and immoral. Marriage is a very sacred union. It isn’t the fact you want to change genders that has me angry its the fact you wanna do it for financial purposes. Nobody stops you from doing what you do as far as you sexuality is concerned. But take something that has been cherished as the focal point of humanity and make an abomination (which by definition btw means to take something pure and add extra foreign elements) is something people are going to fight for strongly and continually. This isn’t something that will eventually blow over. So stop thinking it will. STOP comparing yourselves to victims of racism BECAUSE YOUR NOT!!!
On March 2nd 2011, Tyler wrote:

oh and bible people don’t defend quotes. defend principles. for example, the principle of being kind and loving. Following christ’s example. Problem really is that the bible is obscure about sexuality. This is because the bible assumes you know God’s plan for his Children already, and that its so inherently part of it that it only touches on it. It takes a little thought on MULTIPLE teachings and the A LOT of focused prayful thought to really understand the why behind people’s fear of homosexuality and label it as a sin. Until you go through that effort, BUZZ OFF