Comments on: Miss California Breast Implants — Carrie Prejean Implants Paid For By Miss California Organization

By: Busty Marbis

Busty Marbis — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 19:13:56 +0000

Beautiful and very sexy!

By: duptyr

duptyr — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:59:29 +0000

shows liberals lie easy to further their aganda.

By: FatJack

FatJack — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:07:28 +0000

Crystal You said
“have no concept of the Bible or attriubute no weight to the words” I am attempting to understand your opinion and having trouble as “attriubute” is not found in in Miriam Webster Dictionary. At any rate if you are assigning a weight to a word you are placing a personal value to a word not a literal translation. You also used the phrase “have no concept of the Bible”. Concept is defined as “something conceived in the mind ” Unless I am misunderstanding your statement you are absolutely right. I would never be so presumptions as to place my own concepts and weigh Gods word. I would think the concepts and weights would be Gods own.

By: Hugh Lanham

Hugh Lanham — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:44:06 +0000

I’m sorry but did i miss something? Did this woman actually hurt someone with her opinion? Sure seems like everyone here has an opinion of there own and they dont really care who they might hurt with there words. If you dont want to hear my honest opinion than dont ask me .How about saving the hangmans noose for the real criminals and stop wearing your feelings on your sleeve.She gave her honest opinion and that is her right to do so as is the right to disagree.But all I see is a lot of hatefull hurtfull comments that have no constructive merit and really only show a total lack of respect for any one who does nothing to wrong you but to dissagree with you.debate youre cause, but command respect by showing respect.

By: Crystal

Crystal — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:37:54 +0000

Wow I just came here out of curiosity & it’s so amazing to see so many people commenting on everything, but the article. It’s neat to see people commenting on Christianity when they clearly aren’t Christians and have no concept of the Bible or attriubute no weight to the words therein or have no relationship with Jesus Christ. Way to go!

By: FatJack

FatJack — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:26:21 +0000

Yes the young lady is intitled to her opinion but when she cherry picks biblical words to fit her own agenda she should be called on it. If you look at current divorce rates marriage is not an effective promise to God. It does serve as an effective legal document. But if you went by the biblical version of the bible a woman wouldn’t be allowed to own property. Marriage has changed and rightfully so I believe it is hypocritical to quietly except or demand the changes afforded women and stick to a hard line interpolation regarding others. How would her participation in the pageant be viewed by those who put the Word to paper. I don’t agree with a hard line interpretation of the bible but I can respect those who pick a side and stick to it. If you choose to stand on a soap box quote scripture that suits you and ignore that witch does not fit your own desires you will be called out on it.

By: Elac

Elac — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:32:05 +0000

This young lady has a right to her opinion. People who oppose same sex marriages are call closed minded, out of touch, and all kinds of other nasty things. She beleives in what she beleivess in. That should have been the end of it as far as I`m concerned. She is not jumping on the band wagon just because it`s popular now. Most of you are just talking the popular talk. Keep it real.

By: FatJack

FatJack — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:04:25 +0000

Do you really want an authentic biblical version of marriage. The definition of marriage has changed considerably since biblical times. In biblical times the bride or brides became the property of the groom. It was not one man and one woman. A man could have as many wives, sheep or cattle as he could take care of. Times have changed but people continue to speak for God. The Word is twisted and ignored to conform to the personal views of the high and mighty. That just doesn’t seem right.

By: Jimbo

Jimbo — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:18:02 +0000

As soon as I read the story I thought “holy smokes – that’s got to be a HIPAA violation!”

HIPAA has got some real teeth to it, both civilly and criminally. The civil penalties are small but can be stacked if there are multiple violations with respect to a single individual. The maximum civil penalties are $25,000 per year, per person, per standard. Criminal penalties (up to a $250,000 fine and ten years in prison) may be imposed for “knowingly and improperly” disclosing information …. with higher penalties reserved for violations designed for financial gain or “malicious harm”. State court would likely allow a spring-board suit for torts such as invasion of privacy and infliction of emotional distress, among other causes of action.

The pageant officals said “she allowed us to discose the information on her surgery when she stepped out onto the runway in a swimsuit”. OOOPS! Sorry! The HIPAA law says that anyone with knowledge like this has to obtain WRITTEN PERMISSION specific for such a disclosure. I guess the real question is – did she sign anything that gave the Miss USA pagent the ability to specifically disclose private medical information. A blanket disclosure just won’t cut it.

By: melissa0914

melissa0914 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:16:45 +0000

Oh wow. Reading through some of these comments made me laugh, sigh, and feel down right sad. It’s interesting how one woman can bring up so many emotions… And the woman who made the “feminine” comment like a zillion times in her little post also… hehe thanks for making me laugh. I’m glad they are counter suing her. She lost her crown for a good reason (No not for her stance on gay marriage… which as appallingly homophobic and frusterating as that is, she has a right to that opinion) and then she SUED for losing it. Get over it, woman! You acted like an incredible jack ass once you got the crown to your “employers” (as a sort) and so they called you on it. Life does have consequences!!! Good time to learn that, I suppose.