Pop Crunch

Katie Holmes New York Marathon Fake; Katie Holmes Faked New York Marathon Rumors

2

January 17th, 2008 by Castina

Tagged as: Katie Holmes

Rumors have surfaced that Katie Holmes may have faked her finish in November’s New York Marathon. The Mad Money actress is being accused of having someone else complete the race for her.

Gawker says:
A “mystery” guy was seen running with Katie with a bib number, 6074, that was not registered in the marathon. He is widely assumed to be her bodyguard, which doesn’t seem like a big deal, but I’m mentioning him because he figures in some of these stories. It sounds ludicrous to use such flimsy evidence to suggest that she would fake running the marathon for publicity purposes, but there are some real indicators to suggest she may well have.

Gawker had a tipster send them in the “split times” of Katie Holmes compared to another runner from the NY City Marathon, as found on the official marathon website. The split times are registered electronically at specific stations on the route using the chip for each runner. She has the exact same times, down to the second, of this other guy for most every benchmark in the middle of the race. Even if someone was running alongside her the entire time, would they have the exact same time down to the second like that?

Spotted At

2 Comments, add yours

Related Articles:

What's Hot at PopCrunch?


2 Responses to “Katie Holmes New York Marathon Fake; Katie Holmes Faked New York Marathon Rumors”

  1. On January 18th 2008, tom wrote:

    should this be true? I feel pround for Katie at that time, we even had a party for the great news. it is fake?? o m g….we will fell sorry for her.

  2. On January 19th 2008, donna wrote:

    It gets worse. He was wearing a *time chip*! Why, if he wasn’t actually registered, was he wearing a *chip*? Katie, on the other hand, was wearing pants so long that they covered the tops of her shoes so that you can’t see if there was a chip on them or not.

    I smell a big fat ugly RAT.

What do you think?

comment policy