Jennifer Aniston Vogue Magazine December 2008 Cover Picture

November 11th, 2008 by Castina

Tagged as: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Magazine Covergirls, Vogue Magazine

Well this is one way to sell magazines. Jennifer Aniston is finally opening up about her feelings towards “man-stealing, Melrose Place superbitch” Angelina Jolie.

Jennifer tells Vogue that she was taken aback by Angie’s interview in the January 2007 issue of Vogue.

In that article, the Oscar-winning star recounted the beginning stages of her relationship with Jennifer’s then-husband Brad Pitt. Brad and Angie, now the proud parents of six, met on the set of the film Mr. & Mrs. Smith when Brad was still married to Jen.

“I felt those details were a little inappropriate to discuss,” the Marley & Me star says. “That stuff about how she couldn’t wait to get to work every day? That was really uncool.”

So she’s complaining about statements made in a magazine article nearly two years ago?

Check out the complete Vogue Magazine profile on Jennifer Aniston when the December issue hits newsstands on November 19.

What's Hot at PopCrunch?

23 Comments, add yours

23 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston Vogue Magazine December 2008 Cover Picture”

On November 11th 2008, Steven wrote:

How about a big hot steamy cup of “get over it!”
On November 11th 2008, john wrote:

wowoow i happy her very brave women!!! really pix very hotttt
On November 11th 2008, Rosalyn wrote:

To The first post i reply… why don’t you have a heaping cup of ..”let’s join humanity and have a bit of compassion”… put yourself in her shoes… how would you like it?…
On November 12th 2008, james wrote:

Aniston really needs to get over it. If you didn’t dish in the first year, then swallow it up and MOVE ON. I mean a lot of people feel bad for her but get over it, the man has kids with another woman, obviously he’s moved on, so why shouldn’t you?
On November 12th 2008, carrieparker wrote:

Yes, it happened a couple years ago and maybe she should stop talking about it. But seriously … what Angelina did WAS uncool. Actually, it was downright tacky.
NO ONE can tell Jennifer Aniston how or when she should “get over it”. She has had to live through what should be a very personal and private ordeal in public. She is constantly judged and constantly scrutinized for signs that she’s attempting to keep up with Brangelina by becoming pregnant, being dumped, proposing, et cetera et cetera.
Maybe THE PUBLIC should get over it.

THis is her pain. She will get over it in her own time.
On November 13th 2008, Andrea Thomas wrote:

Jennifer Aniston is absolutely correct in saying what Angelina did was uncool. Brad was a married man and off limits to everyone including Angelina. What happened to our moral judgement, marriage is a sacred agreement between a couple and no one as the right to interfere not even Angelina. Angelina, just because you are famous and beautiful doesn’t give you the right to someone else husband and Brad what you did was more than uncool. Throughout this entire ordeal Jennifer has handled herself with class, dignity and grace, all the best to her.
On November 13th 2008, Marilyn wrote:

You go girl!!! Angelina is a scum sucking pig. I can’t even stand to watch anything either one of those two are in. (Brad and Angelina) Jennifer is so cool, and Brad WILL regret his choice, if he isn’t already, Ha Ha, Marilyn
On November 13th 2008, melanyyy wrote:

I feel for you jen,but i think you waited to long. I will buy the magazine because Im a loyal vogue reader, but i’m not thrilled that your on the cover.
On November 15th 2008, BC wrote:

Good for Jennifer, she has been quiet for too long. What Brad and Angelina did was wrong. And to deny the facts. What comes around goes around. Watch out Angelina
On November 16th 2008, Amanda wrote:

Interesting how vogue put them on the cover in very similar dresses and theme.
On November 16th 2008, Indigo wrote:

First of all, I agree no one has the right to tell her to ‘get over it’. Infidelity is excruciating in the best of circumstances and she had to go through the humiliation in such a public sphere. If you don’t want to read about it, don’t buy the magazine. If it was your sister, your daughter, your friend – you would still be helping her sticking pins into his voodoo likeness.

Another thing why this issue has resurfaced is because Angelina Jolie decided to parade what she did in a mainstream publication. Not to mention before this ‘candid’ interview, she and Brad repeatedly insisted that they didn’t fall in love during the movie and they only got together afterwards. I mean, great, the truth after 3 years – but seriously, you think she’d have an agent who would screen all this stuff. The public’s memory is short term – but not that short.
On November 18th 2008, jla wrote:

I’m picking up what your putting down Jen!!! The world needs to hear your side of the story and you cannot and should not be criticised. What a woman of pure class and style…

It’s quite ironic that the next Mother Theresa (aka Ange) is all about helping and rescuing the millions of people living in extreme poverty, pain and torture (which I do admire) but has failed miserably (on more than one ocasion) to show a decent human being the most basic form of respect. Isn’t disrepect and selfishness some of the major underlying problems of wold poverty? Go figure???

Very very uncool! “A saint she aint”
On November 19th 2008, %&// wrote:

ANGELINA::uncool!!!..
duuhhhh!!
On November 29th 2008, stela wrote:

angelina is a bitch.
On December 7th 2008, Sky wrote:

Angelina is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jennifer so sad to bad!!!!
On December 8th 2008, Monica wrote:

Plain and simple, Angelina said what she said with intent to hurt and humiliate, and hurt she did. Something that will impact another being so tremendously and has been so publicly crucified, does not slip, nor is said without knowing the results. No matter how much she has done or not done for others, this changes my perception of Angelina as a person. I believe it speaks about her morally and second guesses her actual intentions behind every ‘noble’ act.
As to my feelings towards Jen, no I don’t feel bad for her. I sympathize for the pain she must have felt, but in the end she is the happier of the two women. When she is trying to move on and seems content with her life, Angelina can not take her out of her mind… or else, why the extra effort to hurt someone so publicly who should have been in her husbands ‘past’? This just makes every comment that “Jolie is no longer afraid of Angelina” absurd. All along, I believe, it is Angelina who has been afraid of Jen.
On December 8th 2008, Monica wrote:

By the way, being cheated on is no picnic, much less when the other woman is practically scrubbing it at your face for many years; nor does it become easier when everyone wants to know and you try to keep your composure at all times. Don’t bore me with the ‘if she were classy she should have moved on to the next question.” The way I see it, she has every right to be upset and hurt, and to speak about her feelings if she very well pleases to. She is not the one that did wrong, she is not the one that should lower her head and fell ashamed. Nor is it excuse enough if she chose to wait on having children to steal a husband. At the end, Jen and Brad were married and a family. Angelina fell in love him and manipulated everything since to steal him away. Now she may mother one thousand children, but she made her choices and must be woman enough to live with such and their consequences no matter what they are.
Raise your head Jen, and scream to the world if you must. Don’t ever lower your head again!
On December 16th 2008, lee wrote:

marriages don’t just fall apart! when men are unhappy they look to other directions.
I’m not saying that what Angelina did was right; and her comment was insensitive; but she shouldn;t be the only person to blame. Brad wanted a family and Jennifer wasn’t ready yet add that to the rest of their problems and we have a man looking elsewhere.
On December 19th 2008, Bolibee wrote:

Ok, it’s been three years, nearly four. Obviously she still feels inadequate to Angelina because she couldn’t give Brad what he wanted. I mean come on, “‘Not a lot of people get to see a movie where their parents fell in love.’”, How bad is that?

That’s how they met one another. No one would have known what was going on if she didn’t feel the need to express to the public what happened. She should of kept her mouth shut if she didn’t want to hear remarks.

She needs to get over it because I am tired of hearing about it and seeing her face.
On December 30th 2008, Charlotte wrote:

the two years difference seems to mean that where ‘ange’ was eager for everyone to know, jennifer needed time to share. regardless of marriage ten years is a whole lot of shit to just ‘get over’. I’ve heard of moving on and ‘looking elsewhere’ but there is ways of doing it a bit more gracefully. i hope her kids get told the other side too.
On March 2nd 2009, Maria wrote:

Everyone seems to be blaming Angelina which she undoubtedly is, however the one you should be passing blame on his Brad. As he was married to Jennifer. what kind of an example is he setting for his kids??
On August 2nd 2009, linda wrote:

I think angelina needs to spend more money on her lips and get them evened out.
On September 24th 2009, joyce wrote:

There is no question Angelina and Brad gave into physical temptation. Angelina has never known boundaries when considering her men. Though Brad has “moved on” and had children with her, he apparently doesn’t believe in the sanctity of marriage. Angelina will get her just reward eventually.