Hayden Panettiere Lesbian Storyline On “Heroes” (Claire Bennet Gay)
Hayden Panettiere’s character will turn lesbian on NBC’s sci-fi drama Heroes next season, it has been rumored.
The 19-year-old Panettiere will see her screen alter ego, invincible cheerleader Claire Bennet, getting hot and heavy in a same sex romance with her college roommate when season 4 of the action-packed series hits the small screen this fall.
“It’s just girly fun at first,” a source told the Daily Star, “But it might progress into something more serious, it depends how viewers respond.”
Written by Castina on July 7th, 2009 | Tagged as: Hayden Panettiere,TV,TV News
On July 7th 2009, justgroovy wrote:
I watched every show in season 1 and 2. I watched two shows last season. Anyone else have a similar response to a worn-out story line???
On July 7th 2009, equinto wrote:
I love heroes, I don't understand why so many people think the storyline is worn out at all. What DOES bother me is the fact that nobody stays dead, except for nikki, but then she has a twin that she didn't know about, so she really didn't die, in a way. I was so upset when they killed off adam monroe because he could have been a great villian.
on clarie being les… NO F'N WAY!! I wouldn't agree to it if I were hayden. I still want a peter/claire relationship, even though it isn't possible. The end of season 3 really made me interested, when sylar brought up the fact they were both immortal so they should be together. that's all I have to say about that..
On July 7th 2009, steve wrote:
Heroes has been SUPERB so far, but although this seems quite sexy to have this may just be taking this a bit too far. And i agree with equinto stated about Adam Monroe, I always thought of him as a funny character and he would have definately been a brilliant villian but it's the way it goes.
I just hope that it doesn't start to go downhill but the sylar and nathan mix up does seem pretty good although it is obvious he will soon discover what happened. So lets hope and pray…
On September 5th 2009, Wuddever wrote:
Heroes is crap, and this is exactly why. They focus too much on the character's personal lives, instead of the action. As a result, they forget about the seemingly-genius plots. Whatever.
On September 28th 2009, Joe Boyd Morgan wrote:
I'm just looking forward to the hot sex.
On October 14th 2009, chickadee wrote:
I've never missed an episode of Heroes….up until now as I will no longer be tuning in. Why they have to ruin a perfectly good show, I don't know…maybe they're desperate for ratings or maybe it's for the sake of being politically correct, who knows and who cares…They have lost me as a viewer. What a shame :(
On October 15th 2009, heroesfan wrote:
That's great that Claire will be getting a girlfriend! This will technically make her bisexual… rad! I hope they make it real and believable, too… not just "gay in college" or have the sex scenes staged to look like all the fake "lesbian" porn out there. My hopes are probably too high, but this will be a great first step in prime-time, if it happens.
On October 17th 2009, LadyGalaxy wrote:
No way!It's not like i have anything against lesbians or homosexuals,but i would prefer to see Claire hook up with Sylar than turn gay and i don't even like him!This turn of events will ruin the show for me permanently.
On October 18th 2009, echospark wrote:
I see homophobia is alive and well in the 21st century – shame, since the core of the show seems to be accepting people who are different in some way. Obviously lost on the couch-potato generation…
I for one hope that Claire is not written as a lesbian but a bisexual. This would keep the possiblity of a Claire/Sylar relationship in the future open whilst still normalising same-sex relationships (providing it is well executed, of course, and not dropped at the slightest pressure from biggotted ‘fans’).
On October 18th 2009, Nokomis wrote:
Seriously? How homophobic can you be? I don't know if you've read about this, equinto, but Hayden suggested the idea herself. :p
The main reason to stop watching Heroes is because of its predictability. Seems obvious that Gretchen and Claire are going to end up involved and Invisible Girl (can't remember her name) is going to rip them apart somehow. I think it seems like a pretty natural progression for the character, because she's never seemed particularly interested in boys.
Hope they do it well and don't make a huge deal about it. Because it shouldn't be. Like echospark said, the whole show is about acceptance and tolerance.
On October 26th 2009, heroesfan2 wrote:
On the topic of having Claire being gay, no way man. I will quit watching. I am fine homosexuality, but why is it necessary to have a gay person in every show? Take the coolest character in greys anatomy, Tores and turn her gay? There are tons of shows that feel they need to appeal to the gay community, and thats fine, but I think this is overdone. For me Im done if Claire goes gay.
On October 26th 2009, Anythingwill wrote:
It's not about being homophobic, it's about it turning too much into a soap opera!!!
Unless they can think of a REALLY good way of using this to advance the plot then it's just pointless and stupid. As pointed out in someone's comment, it will probably be the all too typical story where they get really close and then get split apart by some outside influence. Probably some part where one of them has to make a "hard decision" between the world and their partner…
On October 27th 2009, J wrote:
So if Claire has a lesbian relationship with Gretchen, that's "soap opera", but if she gets with Sylar that's not?
And on the moral side of things- how laughable that you moralists would rather see Claire have a relationship with a depraved serial murderer and adulterer (taking over Parkman's body to sleep with his wife), than with a sweet girl who genuinely seems to care about her. Gee, how terrible.
The sad thing I was thinking to myself as I noticed this storyline developing basically as soon as these two met, was that it also felt rather contrived to me- and the reason why it felt that way is because homosexuality is such a big "issue" that addressing the topic starts to seem like a way for a show to manufacture controversy- and it only seems this way because of the hypocritical mores of our supposedly "free" society.
On October 27th 2009, CasualViewer wrote:
J,
While I do agree with some of what you say, I will say that you should look at the messier side of society.
Morals are more of a subjective matter. This series only began being interesting to with the recent episodes and I don't mind Claire being gay. I seriously don't care. I was surprised at first because Claire struck me as the good girl, straight up, good daughter type person but my jaw dropped at the kiss. It was awesome and that's what I like about this show. If people make a show according to what the mass audience feels is right, then what's keeping the show from being too predictable. I'd rather the show not listen to these drama queens up top.
On another note..
When you say "free" society, you also have to count social dynamics. Unless the entire society's physical lives change, things outside the box will generally be rejected.
Lets imagine a future generation of a diversified human race. They will still need commonality in order to communicate. This commonality will be considered as the standard and any deviations or anything that seems to conflict with it, will still generally be rejected.
It is because of this commonality that homosexuality is being rejected.
Take a homosexual in a group of straights. The common relationships and social interactions change among the group. The implications of the homosexuality within the group itself changes the whole interaction of either male or female.
One cannot simply relate to them in the same way as others of the same gender.
For men, this creates an especially bad friction. Since men are more than likely to be angry or physical in their rejection and things that "insult" a man is when the existence of someone undermines their self-image of what a man is.
Society's mores are very specific. People either agree or disagree on any definition of free but ultimately, these definitions are controlled by such commonalities.
On October 29th 2009, Jae wrote:
"On the topic of having Claire being gay, no way man. I will quit watching. I am fine homosexuality, but why is it necessary to have a gay person in every show? Take the coolest character in greys anatomy, Tores and turn her gay? There are tons of shows that feel they need to appeal to the gay community, and thats fine, but I think this is overdone. For me Im done if Claire goes gay."
….Wow…you know what's overdone? Straight romances. Because guess what? They've been done on every show, book and video game since god knows how long. You guys look at this as a gay plotline and such. How about you look at it as a romance? Because quite frankly…that's what it is. Why is it that people never have a fuss about gays until it's in their entertainment? We see straight characters all the time, do we complain that there should be less of them? No, we say nothing and hope that there will at some point be a gay character on the show. We get 1 gay character if we're lucky and then people complain that the shows being ruined. Guess what? There are gay people in real life, I bet every one of you knows a gay person. Do you look at them and say, "You're ruining my life by being there." No, you don't. Unless you are a completely uncouth being that is. Anyways, the fact is, we're people too. But when it comes to being shown as real people, we get flack. Put yourselves in our shoes. What if we were getting upset about Claire suddenly being straight? You'd feel cornered, bullied. I understand that you guys are upset because this is out of left field but really…are you going to take away us being recognized? And hell! This is only a bisexual character and you're freaking out. She's not even gay! You guys might say you're not homophobic but you know what?
You sure do seem like it.
On October 29th 2009, MNW wrote:
Why does it even matter if Claire has a same-sex relationship? Obviously most of the viewers are not getting the point of the show-to accept those who are different! How about you try being a little less homophobic and a little more open-minded? If you're going to stop watching one of your favorites shows just because you disagree with a minor plot line, you must not have been too dedicated to it before. You don't stop watching your favorite series just because suddenly there's a small possibility of a bisexual main character. It's laughable that so many Americans even think that this is a big deal. I thought we were all about change and being more open-minded from now on. Or have we forgotten about all of that now? Are we reverting back to our self-destructive and conservative ways?
Attention: Heroes is not going to be ruined as a result of a bisexual/gay plotline! It will still be the same amazing show-if not better! I look more forward to watching the series after Monday's episode!
On November 1st 2009, FTW wrote:
Homophobes, grow up. I think it'll be interesting, I can't wait to see it! Everything I was going to say has already been said, so I'll leave it as that.
On November 9th 2009, Derek wrote:
Seems like a desperate move for ratings considering magical switches don't turn on in peoples' heads where they decide they are lesbian one day.
This is no reason to stop watching it of course. It's still an amazing series. The story never specified that it would be people saving other peoples' lives, though some of them do.
I personally do not care if she's lesbian, but it's just not logical for her to magically turn lesbian after being interest in boys and only boys her whole life. The story could have stayed the same without her friend kissing Claire, therefore I call this a desperate move for ratings.
On November 10th 2009, Christian_fan wrote:
Why??? Those of you in the gay/lesbian community have the right to your 'open minded' opinion but as soon as anyone disagrees with you they must be 'closed minded.' I am so sick and tired of this new thought process and how it is infiltrating every aspect of society.
Here it is – we ALL get to form our own opinions as individuals. So why am I to be ashamed of my opinion? I do not dislike the people of the gay/lesbian community. I do however disagree with their lifestyle. Under that personal opinion I do not surround myself with those who are gay/lesbian. I also chose by my own free will to not watch shows, movies, or other media which 'normalizes' those relationships. So I get a label 'closed minded' or 'homophobe' hmmm this is of concern because I fear next I could be labeled for my opinion of where I CHOOSE to live. Am I a 'suburbiphobe'? I also don't like cable, uh-oh I am one those 'cableiphobes.' I have know some people who don't like dogs, you know the type 'canineiphobes'. Sorry that probably gets my point across and I know some of those phobias are real although I did not look for the proper terms.
So can we all please just stop with the 'you must be a homophobe' crap. We have opinions have opinions that differ and that is our right as individual humans. Personaly I think life in general on this earth would suck if we thought the same things.
Anyhow just take minute and think about why those of us who disagree should be labeled as the 'closed minded'.
Thanks for listening.
James
On November 26th 2009, Nemo wrote:
@ Christian_Fan (James)
Existing doesn't count as shoving our opinions down your throat. Wanting to be recognized as a valid member of society doesn't count as shoving our opinions down your throat. Wanting to see relationships we personally have the ability to connect with doesn't count as shoving our opinions down your throat. Wanting to see a gay/lesbian relationship in a mature context that lasts for more than a single make-out/threesome scene does not count as shoving our opinions down your throat. Wanting to not be marginalized or written out of the script because a small group of people who isolate themselves from anyone that contradicts their personal view of morality does not count as shoving our opinions down your throat.
But telling people that they're entire existence doesn't merit a single storyline that probably won't outlast half a season of Heroes because people like you are horrified by it? Well. I wonder what you call that.
@ All the Claire/Sylar fans
As you can see, she's more likely to fall for a woman than a psychopathic serial killer who also happens to be struggling with the mind of the man he murdered. And you disgust me for thinking she would.
@ that guy who wanted her to end up with Peter.
Ew.
And as far as this plot-line being out of left-field. It isn't. Let's not forget, Claire hasn't stated one way or the other if she actually wants to be with Gretchen. There is an interest and an obvious attraction, but any lesbian can tell you that doesn't always lead to happy endings. If it is, the writers are taking their time to develop a romance. If not, it'll end like a lot of college lesbian relationships. Why don't we wait and see how it turns out.
On December 21st 2009, Scott wrote:
That will be the last Heroes I watch. It is a shame, I used to really like that show.
On December 21st 2009, Todd wrote:
They continue to ram their secret agendas down our throats. Why can't entertainment be just that… entertainment. If NBC forces its gay acceptance on me, and I will stop watching not only Heroes, but NBC!
I have my own stances on abortion, gay rights, politics, etc., but I do NOT go to my friends, to parties, etc and stand on a soapbox and spew it all over. In the same point, I do watch TV to see their stances.
On December 21st 2009, Mike wrote:
There are several "hot topics" I have learned to avoid when on sales calls. They include religion, politics, economy and looks of people (e.g. weight, hair, attractiveness, etc.). I sure as heck would not talk about gay acceptance.That doesn't mean I am for or against gay rights, just smart!
Having that said, the only reason a TV show would include hot button issues (e.g. abortion, gay, etc.). would be to push secret agendas or stir up talk. I believe it is the former and as a result, I will hit them where it hurts which is avoiding their commercial sponsors.
On December 21st 2009, TRigma wrote:
I do believe you folks are homophobic. Watching gay people on TV won't make your kids gay or force the public to be accepting. However, one of the posts makes a good point that it is a "hot topic", but that doesn't mean it should be avoided. Everyone needs to reallize that being gay is the fad in Hollywood for today just like adopting kids from 3rd world countries. Just wait and it will become boring and they will move on to making something else acceptable and "cool". Personally, I hope it is being obese. :)
On December 28th 2009, Alexis wrote:
I really hope they dont make claire gay i want her and peter to get together.
On December 29th 2009, Stephanie wrote:
NO! Next it will be Hiro Nakamura and Ando being gay partners. It has nothing to do with gay tolerance and everything to do with my intolerance for TV to put a gay person in every show like advertising sexual orientation in a commercial!
Claire is NOT gay and making her so in the show will end it for me. NBC, do it at your own peril and watch your ratings drop (even more), not because of peoples unacceptance, but because it is a BAD storyline. The show is on life support already, why put the stake in the heart too?
On January 18th 2010, Jim wrote:
WTF is Clair gay now? This really messes up the show. I mean cmon do they have to make everybody gay in every show?? I'm just tired of it. And the people who keep saying homophobes this and that must be complete idiots. I'm a guy and im suppose to like woman and i am made to do so. So why would i ever think that gay was cool????? If this issue was no big deal then nobody would care to say anything. But that's not the case so wtf is wrong with you people???? I loved the show all the way up to this point.
On January 18th 2010, Jim wrote:
And gay tolerance nothing. I don't have to tolerate that crap. Its just plain wrong. And i am not wrong for saying this. Wake up!!
On January 18th 2010, Cynthia wrote:
I agree. Claire going gay will end my viewing of this program. I have really enjoyed it so far. It's been clean and entertaining. The storyline has held my interest. Most of my friends and family feel the same. The older kids will no longer be watching either. Why ruin a good thing?
On January 18th 2010, Mel Ancholy wrote:
I have seen two people who have said they want to see Clair and Peter get together. One word to describe that relationship: Incest.
Peter is her uncle.
I don't care if the people are gay or straight, I don't want to see them making out on tv. That's not why I watch it. The only people I want to see making out are my wife and I.
What's up with Clair being bisexual? Isn't a person one or the other. If one claims to be bisexual then nobody is born gay. It is either a choice or one is born that way. It can't be both.
Hollywood get it straight (no pun intended).
On January 19th 2010, E. Nigma wrote:
Mel Ancholy… DAMN YOU!!! You've said all i wanted to say word for word lmao…The Peter thing is creepy. Homosexuality is either born with it or a choice…
On the note of whoever said, we gay people need characters in every show as well and sometimes we are lucky to get only one….Such is life, I am black, used to wonder why there would always only be like 1 or if luck 2 main black Characters…but at the end of the day….makes sense, we are still a minority, and i believe homosexuals are a minority as well not unless i missed something…..
I also wondered whats with the gay plot? political correctness? rating seeking? but at the end of the day, many are right….Heores is about accepting those who are different so it has a place in the plot and inst just a gimmick…cuz I hate gimmicks that have nothing to do with the plot….
On January 19th 2010, E. Nigma wrote:
haha, just read my post…It could be missread that i am saying I am gay. Im not. Im straight. was just quoting what someone said earlier….
On January 19th 2010, RP wrote:
FFS!!! for all of you that are against this gay/ bisexual thing.. you are all ridiculous, and you actually should be ashamed of yourselves! what the hell??? its just a relationship like many! i think it was a hell of a great idea, tbf… they are just trying something new with the show..so why not? our society has gay/bisexual/straight people, so why can't they be a part of it in shows in an equal way…!? why do people have to judge the damn thing asiif it was a big deal! who cares?
You can deny it, but it is indeed homophobia.. and thats proper disgusting!
And Mel, you can be both… tbh, i think everyone is a lil of both even! but they just seem to focus on the society who brings them the idea that things are suposed to be like this or that..
On January 19th 2010, daniel wrote:
well…whether people like it or not, being gay is a part of our world, so don't get irritated it's been included in the plot! Just like showing straight couples on EVERY DAMN SHOW can get irritating and boring! Come on- what's the big deal? A big plus for Heroes they have included a 'positive' gay role model, as looking at most previous comments of those 'homophobes' -they would love to see Syler as a psycho killer who being gay wants to slay everybody..and thus solve the problem of his inner evil…hahahahaha!
Grow UP you bunch of homophobes! Grow UP! Gay people are around us and won't just vanish because you say you don't want to see Claire kissing another girl! :)
On January 19th 2010, Amy wrote:
Heroes is dead to me now. They acted like they were leading towards a Sylar/Claire relationship and then just ruined it by making Claire gay all of a sudden. It's like they have some idiot who closes his eyes and picks a random thought out of a hat and they run with it! It's not even like Claire had gay tendencies earlier on in the show… they just run out of ideas and decide to either make a character gay, kill someone (and then bring them back to life) or screw with someone's powers. Boring! Next thing you know we'll spend a whole episode with Sylar (after he's developed Alzheimer's and been adopted by HRG) while he's picking out frilly pink curtains for Mr. Muggles' new dog house! What do you think about that NBC? Sound like a good idea for your next episode? *Morons*
On January 19th 2010, RP wrote:
oh dude, do you actually do anything else in life other than bitching about the show? you don't like it, you don't watch… like they care! Youre getting pissed about something so stupid… just stop, re-read ure post… and think! pointless! there you go, have a good day
On January 19th 2010, Jackie wrote:
As part of the GLBT community I think it is wonderful to get some representation on heroes. Showing such an authentic relationship on prime time television will do wonderful things for kids in small towns struggling with their own sexualities. I love the way the relationship is progressing and only hope that it will continue. Our relationships are no different then any other. Love is love everyone. Thank you Hayden and thank you heroes, your support is a huge step in the right direction for us.
On January 19th 2010, RP wrote:
Go Jackie :)
On January 19th 2010, Nama wrote:
Typical "You're a homophobe if you don't like A / B" replies from the peanut gallery.
Perhaps people are annoyed how weak Claire episodes are, and suddenly making her bisexual with NO DEVELOPMENT, is even more annoying.
On January 20th 2010, marcus squires wrote:
eww if she is i will stop watching the show, she is to hot not to like guys
On January 21st 2010, Ali wrote:
someone sugguested that claire and peter get together. That would be gross they are related. I think they are trying this "new twist" to boost rating but I think that if they keep going they will lose fans. I have watched every episode and have all the season so far on DVD. But I have to say if this keeps going the way it is my family will stop watching. And please no comments on how i am a homophob or anything I just dont want to watch that on TV.
On January 23rd 2010, Jake Shatly wrote:
I was a Heroes devotee for season 1–couldn't wait for the next chapter. Season two just didn't do it for me. To me they tried too hard, Too many new characters, too many plot twists. Maybe I'm just a simpleton–but character development took a nose dive. Between season 1 and 3, I can't even tell who's who–there's not even any internal consistancy. I tried again in season three, but it started to feel too much like LOST–which I was after missing a few episodes. Claire's orientation is the least of their worries, and my reasons not to watch–but for me it's over.
On January 25th 2010, USER wrote:
Ur all Gay including the show.
On January 28th 2010, Martin Walther wrote:
Wow, this really is a hot issue in the US it seems :P.
Sure this can be seen as a marketing stunt and a sort of out of the blue development…
And I can kinda understand why someone, who's favourite character is Claire, sees her engage in a homosexual relationship suddenly can find it hard to emotionally connect to her in this context.
If people had been arguing something like that, I would have understood and respected their choice not to watch the show anymore for that reason.
But when you're shouting 'Gay agenda!' or 'Gay values are being shoved down my throat!' or 'Me and my Christian values feel so oppressed and persecuted because two men or two women hold hands on TV'… Well, then I just kinda have to laugh. Like.. Gay people are sorta all over the place, so I think they deserve some form of representation on TV-shows now and then.
And I'm one of those weird persons who kinda mentally blocks out the guy from every TV-relationship… since well, I don't really like thinking about the dude in any intimately emotional or sexual context. So yea.. I'm not sad about this Cletchen development, since I can now focus on both characters. But to be honest, there hasn't even been that much Claire/Gretchen screen-time and the show is about so many other things anyway.. I dunno why this is so important to you all.
Oh well, have a good one!
Greetings from Denmark
On January 28th 2010, kells bells wrote:
Ok so I'm gay and I watch a lot of different programs including the typical chick flick guy and girl meet fall in love blah blah blah. Actions, drama's everything. Who cares???
don't understand why you are upset unless you're confused about your own sexuality. It's not a bad thing to have people be comfortable with themselves and try to have an equal society where one day it really won't matter cos love is love.
oh and by the way
The people who were opposed to interracial marriage 50 years ago believed that their views were perfectly logical. (90% of the US believed that, in fact.) History proved them wrong, and history will prove you wrong, too.
On February 7th 2010, becky wrote:
does anyone realise shes gay in real life. Jesus it aint forced on you.but you feel like if you dont like it you have to moan. Get a life. If you dont care dont comment. I am a loyal fan and always will be. Plus shes well hot
On February 8th 2010, whitney wrote:
hahaha It's a show. GET OVER IT. if you afraid that watching a "gay romance" on tv is going to turn you out, don't watch it. those coments are pathetic.
To everyone that said "I'm not homophobic or anything i just don't want to see it." NEWS FLASH your a homophobe. You either except it all, or you don't, there is no middleground there.
There's a million and one shows out there, if it's to much for you, watch something else. Like anyone cares that your going to stop watching a tv show because of gay character. you're really showing us. get over yourself.
On February 9th 2010, Fred - Scifi guy wrote:
First of all I want to make perfectly clear that I don’t have nothing against gay relationships, but I do think that is stupid to turn Claire in to a lesbian, I mean why can they just make another character that has a lesbian relationship and at the same time has to deal with her powers? But no, the networks always do stupid things like this to have more ratings. That’s the only reason why they are doing it. Hello! Haven’t they learned that that’s exactly what has ruined a lot of great shows in the past? Any way, leaving the Claire part at a side, I just I hope that this season is good, the other one was too regular and it was starting to get too predictable for me.
On February 9th 2010, Stupid wrote:
My wife and I both heard they were going that route. If it didnt feel so forced than I would ignore it like I do the Office and Flash Forward and several other shows. But it just feels like an agenda pushing move.So my wife and both are now no longer watching the show. We hadnt missed a show ever…until 2 weeks ago. I am done with the show…so are about 9 other couples we are friends with.
So at the end of the day, I hope the gay agenda pushers are happy. You got your gay relationship…but your show will be cancelled sooner now. MANY people have stopped watching.
On February 9th 2010, Stupid wrote:
FYI…also love the "except it all your a homophobe"
I guess I am a "blanka"phone of everything I disagree with. lol.
On February 28th 2010, chris wrote:
We can love gay people without being accepting of their lifestyles. A gay lifestyle will not bring happiness, any more than sleeping around, or cheating on your wife. Just ask anyone who is gay. It makes for a hard life. If you believe homosexuality is wrong, it doesn't make you a homophobe or closed minded.
We all have our issues… some people have this one. We need to work through our problems, change and try to do better… telling someone it's okay to continue down the wrong path doesn't make us true friends regardless of the "issues" they are having – straight or gay.
On April 16th 2010, iondude wrote:
I just don't see the logic in making her character gay. This imo is just (like someone already said) a desperate attempt for ratings. I don't see any possible plot progression by making her fall in love with some random chick. Maybe if she had powers or in some way was killed by the baddie and caused claire to go crazy and unleash some new power. But I'm just very dissapointed at the general plot progression of heroes. With a story about random heroes, there is just so much potential there that is being undertold. Honestly the writers seem to be some of the most uncreative storytellers I've seen in tv in a while. Having a mild personality trait be the focus of plot development is just obsurd imo. Hell the biggest problem I've seen with the series is that the writers have no backbone. Decide to kill someone and bring them back or change around powers or completely drop storylines because there were a few complaints. Word of advice to the writers. Use your own imagination and do what you feel you would be interested in. There are always goin to be ppl who hate your ideas. But that's what makes them yours. Don't change your feelings and your thoughts around just because some people said they didn't like it. Tell the story. If ppl like it then they like it. But you will build more devoted fans if you have a story that follows it's plotline to fruition. As far as claire being lez.Think about priorities and work on the main plot. It's obvious that your in need of ideas. So work on that. When you have a solid main story, then think about the details of the character's personal lives. When that happens you'll win me back over as a fan. But in recent episodes I just catch myself gritting my teeth through another hour long episode in hopes of being able to follow the story that will eventually get interesting. I understand writer's block, but when the story gets good again I will be a fan again. Till then. It's back to something else. Hope you consider some of my thoughts and think about it.
On March 12th 2011, vixen0424 wrote:
anyway, it isn’t a big deal for me if claire would have a relationship with gretchen..actually perceived them as cute being together:)
and it really shocked me i watched the episode when gretchen admitted that she has a crush on claire especially when she kissed claire on the lips.and that’s the time ive being more interested on claire..and finally being a great fan of her..she’s really doing a great job..:)
anyway, we have our own perception regarding the scene.
On April 7th 2011, Petrellipep wrote:
Okay! So yes I think the Les Bo thing is absoulutly insane for her charecter. But it’s true that I expected that much from greaten. As for peter and Claire. HELLO! He is her friking uncle! Although off screen would have been good.
As for sylar. I had my hopes. In till I remembered that all of Nathen (claires father) memories were in his head. So wouldn’t that be even worse than haveing a relashonship with ur uncle?????