Pop Crunch

Porn Addiction, Diana Bianchi Testimony Peter Cook Christie Brinkley Divorce Trial

1

July 2nd, 2008 by Castina

Tagged as: Christie Brinkley, Divorce

Christie Brinkley’s estranged husband said Wednesday he had sex with his then-eighteen year old lover in his office and paid her $300,000 while hoping to keep their affair quiet. New York architect Peter Cook is fighting the 70s/80s era glamour model for custody of the couple’s two children, Jack, 13, and Sailor, 10.

A shamed Peter testified that he spent approximately $3,000 on Internet porn during his marriage.

Peter’s former mistress also took the stand on Wednesday. Diana, who was summoned to court by Brinkley’s legal team, says she had sex with her then boss in their Hamptons workplace, as well as several homes owned by Christie.

“In his office he asked me how I would feel if he told me that he was attracted to me and that’s really how it all started,” Bianchi said under oath, the New York Post reports.

“I think I was a little taken aback, but I wasn’t against it either really,” the teen said on the stand. “I wouldn’t say that one of us pushed the other. I would say that it was a mutual thing.”

1 Comments, add yours

Related Articles:

What's Hot at PopCrunch?


One Response to “Porn Addiction, Diana Bianchi Testimony Peter Cook Christie Brinkley Divorce Trial”

  1. On July 9th 2008, Manny Burke wrote:

    I think that if the young lady is pursuing a music career, then she better start now because the publicity is terrible. That means that Bianci may lose the battle for money, but she has certainly attained lots of public attention. Even though its negative attention, she should write and produce an album now, and get on youtube. unfortunately, singers like Ray J, and Paris Hilton, felt that they needed to show the world their bodies so we could hear their voices.
    We should make collaborative efforts to ensure that this rebellious social climate can somehow be a tool to bring about some kind of reflection upon tradionalism.

What do you think?

comment policy