Comments on: Debbie Rowe Wants Custody Of Michael Jackson’s Children

By: clarrie

clarrie — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:54:59 +0000

I think Michael’s kids are better off without their mother (Debbie). Watching the memorial last tuesday was certainly full of emotion and you truly see the Jackson family grieving. Why should Debbie be awarded custody when she barely knows her kids?? Sure, she gave birth to them but she never really got to know them. Janet should take care of Michael’s kids.

By: Jillian

Jillian — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:28:46 +0000

I think any of the other Jackson family members should take care of the three kids, not the grandparents. I believe Debbie Rowe is just in it for the money. Any of Micheal’s brothers and sisters already have money and could take care of the three kids and please do not separate them. They all need each other at this time. Shame on you Joe and Katherine Jackson for what you did to Michael!!!!

By: nicki

nicki — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:07:53 +0000

This is so crazy right now . Those sweet kids’ father just died, and now they might have to go live with some person they barely know, who is supposed to be their mother…I think the kids should choose…

P.S- I don’t exactly have the best feeling about debbie rowe being their mom … I feel like she’s only getting them for the money. But what do I know ? It’s not like I’m related to them or anything… so yeah.

By: pamela

pamela — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:06:42 +0000

I have to say they are better off with debbie, then the Jackson nuts, the mother was just as bad as the father, because she stood by and let the abuse happen, and she would do it again with Michael’s kids, they destroyed all their children’s lives, by abuse of many kinds, Michael’s the most ,do you think he is not turning over in his grave, thinking his dad will be around his precious children???????? he just wants access to the money, and knowing mom will have the kids, will bring him write back into the house again, yes maybe debbie also wants money, but at least she is not a child abuser, and maybe she always wanted a relationship with her kids, but because Michael would not allow this, and he paid her off, she lied and said she did not care about them, money will make you do allot of things you may not really want to do. and from the pictures i saw with her, michael, and the two kids, it sure did not look like she did not care.

By: tyna

tyna — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:49:54 +0000

Debbie,
Micheal jackson will torment you for life should you take those children. He doesnt even know you that much. Sorry.

By: Candi

Candi — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:12:39 +0000

Has anyone thought to ask the kids what they want and who they would rather be with???
In my opinion, any woman who sells her children also sell her rights as a mother. If she loves them soo much why has the Jackson family been the only ones to console the children???

By: Patty Willy

Patty Willy — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:44:04 +0000

Wha, you don’t want the kids to call u mom? then what should they call you?…..DAD lol

By: debbie who ??

debbie who ?? — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:36:17 +0000

That bitch wants MONEY and she trying to act important and please dont say it’s cause she don’t want them near Joe woman please he got other family to care for them take your dike ass to sleep

By: Zinne-zi

Zinne-zi — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:02:01 +0000

To hell with Debbie Rowe! Janet should take care of the kids.

By: Marie

Marie — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:45:53 +0000

of course she wants cu$tody!! They don’t even know her! but if takes that to put that kids away from Joe jackson then MAYBE is better… Still think Janet is the one who should take care of the kids!