Comments on: Debbie Rowe Could Get Custody Of Michael Jackson Kids

By: Hannah

Hannah — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:33:35 +0000

I’m going to marry his son prince michael Joseph Jackson 1 he is the most adorable 12 I have ever seen and it’s barely any age difference at all. 12 and 14 met him before :D amazing…hot….everything i could ever want and more ^^,

By: Linda Griffiths

Linda Griffiths — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:01:40 +0000

Why should Debbie Rowe get custody. She was happy enough to sell them for a substantial amount of money to Michael. Why should they be torn away from their family who loves them, to be given to a woman they don’t know and who has never even bothered to fight for them before??? I know she’s their biological mother, but that counts for nothing when she chose money over her rights to be a mum. The children should have the right to choose. Maybe, then she could be slowly and gently eased into their lives.

By: nicki

nicki — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:52:39 +0000

from the hell to the no . Michael already gave her like, eight million dollars because she signed away her parental rights . And now she wants ‘em back? To me, that’s a super greedy thing to do . She even said she was a bad mom and would probably never see them again . And isn’t she getting $100 million if she chooses NOT to get them ? Smh… I think they’d be better off with Mrs. Katherine Jackson or Janet .
And prince michael I is a real CUTIE =)

By: nicki

nicki — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:49:24 +0000

By: Doina

Doina — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:33:51 +0000

See article, “Who Will Get Custody of Michael Jackson’s Children?” by California Certified Family Law Specialist Marshall Waller at http://www.TheCaliforniaFamilyLawBlog.com.

By: antoinette

antoinette — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:53:47 +0000

I say NO . . . She shouldnt get them. She said clearly that she didnt want them and they were not her kids. They were his. She wanted MONEY and thats what she got.

By: sunseray weber

sunseray weber — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:51:38 +0000

I think the mother should get the kids!!!!!!!But if she has a heart she should also take the little one to keep them together,But they should check into why she let him keep the children because if all she wants is money that would be no.But the kids should also have a choice