Chris Crocker Nude Photo Confession

October 2nd, 2007 by Castina

Britney Spears ‘Stan’ Chris Crocker has admitted that he is in fact featured in a series of nude photos that surfaced online early last week. NSFW After The Jump.

For days now I have been bombarded with messages about the nude photo scandal. The truth is, I was young and stupid when I took those pictures. So young in fact that I was 17 at the time. (so does this mean the pics are kiddy porn now?)

I do not condone anyone underage or OF age to post nudes, but in my own personal defense- I had a lot of alone time in the last half of my teen years, [I was home schooled] and when you’re young self-discovery..happens.

I obviously did this behind my parents backs and I am truly embarrassed for myself and my family at this time, but I just wanted to clear the air and let anyone and everyone know, that has saved these pictures that it is illegal seeing as though I was 17 at the time, so when you brag that you “saw Chris Crocker naked!!!”..what you’re really bragging that you saw a 17 year old me naked.

What's Hot at PopCrunch?

21 Comments, add yours

21 Responses to “Chris Crocker Nude Photo Confession”

On October 3rd 2007, MrBIG wrote:

Wow! Funny that this crying sheman, tranny, whatever has the hugest balls ever. Nice pole too, I bet he’s a grower! :)
On October 3rd 2007, taylorblue wrote:

wow…that is way more than I had to see!!
On October 3rd 2007, Topher wrote:

Now you know why queens should be honored like their name indicates…they are the hotties of our community. It’s the recently come-outers with their internal homophobia that denounce them. Back in the day they were praised for being who they are. Now you see that THEY are the ones with the balls.
On October 6th 2007, ewwwww wrote:

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
On October 8th 2007, Jamie wrote:

what an ugly fucking dick!
On October 9th 2007, Matthew Makeout wrote:

I like Chris Crocker… He’s funny and stuff, but OMFG, NASTY NASTY
NASTY! :( But I don’t hate him or anything, we all do things when we are younger that we regret. I’ve been thinking about posing in pictures nude but realized when I get older thats not what i’m going to want coming out. Well yeah.. http://WWW.MYSPACE.COM/MATTHEWMAKEOUT
On October 26th 2007, rob red wrote:

wow his 15 mins come and when fast did they not? lol
On October 27th 2007, michelle. wrote:

Umm.. Wow…
Pulled a Pete on us didn’t ya?
&Frankly, i don’t think anyone is gonna brag about seeing him naked.
Seriously? Is he trying to get more famous with these fucking photos or something?
Because bby, trust me, these are not helping.
Haha.
bring on the hate mail!
On February 24th 2008, Schwoppiie wrote:

Why are people so caught up about this? So what chris was naked in a couple of pictures, he had nothing to do. And, secondly, he isn’t the only one with nude photos on the internet. Just think of vanessa hudgens. All her little fans. She must be going through a tough time right now. How can they concentrate with all this hate and bashes. So what! They don’t do this by themselves. I mean, yeah they do it by themselves, but what I’m saying is, they become this way by influences of other people. I’m not accusing anyone, I’m just explaining that the way others act can bring on the influence on younger people. We can’t stop what they do, we just have to help them out. ^_^
On August 9th 2008, ts luver wrote:

aww these suck i was hopeing he would have the long hair and makeup on and show his cute lil ass. o well i can only dream a porno movie leaks out paris hilton style of some dude banging him in his tight ass yummmy.
On August 11th 2008, Patrick wrote:

TS Luver - people like you are offensive.
Topher - That goes for you too. Crossdressers, drag queens and the such are an inult to same gender affection. The problem with the gay community nowadays is that there is this umbrella over every fetish, perversion and mutation under the sun and people try to generalize them all with the term gay. This stigmatizes many men, like myself, that DON’T fall into any of these categories, don’t identify with these aberrations and don’t condone these ’self-appointed, self-styled representatives of the gay community’.

Chris Crocker was damn attractive. What the hell happened in his mind that warped him into the affront he is today? Truly tragic.

No Topher, the queens are NOT the hotties of the community. They are the embarrassment to anyone MALE. Homosexuality has all to do with masculinity - between MEN - not pseudo-women.

“Back in the day they were praised for being who they are.”

Back in the day? When was that. Gays were making real strides way before Stonewall…Harry Hay and the Mattachine Society was the beginning of the rights movement. Everyone attributes gains to the queens, but the truth is…people like them set back our gains by decades. Every damn gay parade it’s the same ‘equality’ mantra being preached, until we’ve browbeat the public into appeasement of the fringe and fetish groups, rather than genuine acceptance for our same gender affections.

WE aim to educate the public and change understanding of our same gender affections. Check out http://www.g0ys.org - spelled G zero Y S
WE are the g0ys: Brotherhood, Camaraderie, Masculine Respect!
On August 11th 2008, Jack Studly wrote:

G0YS - way to go man…
On August 11th 2008, Ryan ReBoRn wrote:

Nice post! It is sad though, how warped he became.
On September 19th 2008, Zoboxx wrote:

He has one HOT cock, though and awesome balls!! Great shots!!
On October 25th 2008, FREAKAYY wrote:

wow i would totally love to have sex with him it would feell soo good haha!j/k but he has big balls but totally i was joking about the doing him thang
okayyyy
On December 12th 2008, shaboobla wrote:

I have a crush on chris crocker before his whole make-up crazy tranny-ness came out.
On December 30th 2008, id tap that. wrote:

he has some big ass balls.
but
he kinda has a tiny penis.
[no affence or anything.]
On April 12th 2009, Tim wrote:

idk bout yall but idk let him put that in me anytime that is a nice one and i bet its grown, i wish he’d finish off by blowing it on my face!
On April 27th 2009, Patrick wrote:

As I happened to find myself passing through here again, I reread my previous post…I mentioned the Mattachine Society (1950). Actually, the homosexual rights movement started even further back than that. The Society for Human Rights (1924) in Chicago predated the Mattachine Society, but was shut down by the police after only a few months.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Society_for_Human_Rights

A year before the Society was established, anarchist Emma Goldman became the first person in the United States to publicly endorse LGBT rights, stating, “I regard it as a tragedy that people of differing sexual orientation find themselves proscribed in a world that has so little understanding of homosexuals…” (Rutledge, Leigh, Gay Book of Lists. p. 169. 1992).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Goldman

In the present day, the greater tragedy is attributing the equal rights struggle to a bunch of out-of-control drag queens.
On April 27th 2009, David wrote:

Your on the right Track Patrick.

I recommend those interested in the topic to read Androphilia by Jack Melebranche.

It is sad that young gay men coming up think that they have to act feminine or dress like a girl.
Furthermore, groups and individuals who are on the right track rarely get the attention that destructive groups and individuals get.
hmmmm. looks like some people don’t want real productive progress.
On April 28th 2009, Patrick wrote:

Thank you for your kind words David. I believe I am on the right track too…although I believe I am further along that track than Jack Malebranche/Androphilia promotes. ;-)

J.M. has good intentions I am sure, but I have problems with him being the role model needed in that I think he has areas in which he falls short himself.

Ok, I agree that effeminate behavior/cross-dressing, etc., is a plague on the male community. In J.M.’s own artwork he depicts scenarios in which men are often demeaned in other ways - sexual domination and humiliation is a big theme. Another area in which he raises questions is the fact that he is an ordained priest of the Church of Satan. While I will defend anyone’s right to believe/follow whatever they want, in the larger picture, this fact wouldn’t be received well by the larger demographic if J.M. were proclaimed the chosen leader of the ‘new’ gay community. I also understand that many in the C.of S. will insist the religion is not about the worship and promotion of evil, but often the visuals depicted along with that ‘crowd’ tell a different tale on the individual level.