<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Barack Obama Hillary Clinton Secretary Of State</title> <atom:link href="http://www.popcrunch.com/barack-obama-hillary-clinton-secretary-of-state-offer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.popcrunch.com/barack-obama-hillary-clinton-secretary-of-state-offer/</link> <description>A Celebrity News Tabloid For Celeb Gossip Junkies</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: sloane</title><link>http://www.popcrunch.com/barack-obama-hillary-clinton-secretary-of-state-offer/comment-page-1/#comment-61519</link> <dc:creator>sloane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcrunch.com/?p=31437#comment-61519</guid> <description>I think that Clinton is a shoe-in for the job. But maybe she would be better suited (and be more fulfilled by) tackling domestic issues (health care?) that she has already done so much work on?Dr. Tantillo, who has a marketing and branding blog ( http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv ), argued against the notion of a joint Obama-Clinton ticket back in May:&quot;Because of the length of this primary fight, brand identity and loyalty to brand have become central.  What this means is that a kind of brand mutual exclusivity has set in.  The Obama brand stands for something that the Hillary brand does not.  And vice versa!&quot; Tantillo&#039;s full post on Obama-Clinton joint ticket proposal: http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/05/14/marketing-101joint-ticket-makes-little-branding-sense.aspxBut at this stage--especially with all that Clinton did in the general election phase to help get Obama elected-- I think that the Clinton brand has shifted enough that it would make smart branding sense (for Obama and Clinton but especially for the Democratic Party) for Obama to give give Clinton and Clintonites a role in the new administration.Tantillo&#039;s recent post on Obama as president-elect:  http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/11/09/brand-winners-barack-obama--retail.aspx</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Clinton is a shoe-in for the job. But maybe she would be better suited (and be more fulfilled by) tackling domestic issues (health care?) that she has already done so much work on?</p><p>Dr. Tantillo, who has a marketing and branding blog ( <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv" rel="nofollow">http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv</a> ), argued against the notion of a joint Obama-Clinton ticket back in May:</p><p>&#8220;Because of the length of this primary fight, brand identity and loyalty to brand have become central.  What this means is that a kind of brand mutual exclusivity has set in.  The Obama brand stands for something that the Hillary brand does not.  And vice versa!&#8221;<br /> Tantillo&#8217;s full post on Obama-Clinton joint ticket proposal: <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/05/14/marketing-101joint-ticket-makes-little-branding-sense.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/05/14/marketing-101joint-ticket-makes-little-branding-sense.aspx</a></p><p>But at this stage&#8211;especially with all that Clinton did in the general election phase to help get Obama elected&#8211; I think that the Clinton brand has shifted enough that it would make smart branding sense (for Obama and Clinton but especially for the Democratic Party) for Obama to give give Clinton and Clintonites a role in the new administration.</p><p>Tantillo&#8217;s recent post on Obama as president-elect: <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/11/09/brand-winners-barack-obama--retail.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/11/09/brand-winners-barack-obama&#8211;retail.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley Neal</title><link>http://www.popcrunch.com/barack-obama-hillary-clinton-secretary-of-state-offer/comment-page-1/#comment-61399</link> <dc:creator>Ashley Neal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:05:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcrunch.com/?p=31437#comment-61399</guid> <description>Change you can believe in?  Give me a break.  Hillary is same old bullshit.  I thought Barrack promised change.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change you can believe in?  Give me a break.  Hillary is same old bullshit.  I thought Barrack promised change.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.popcrunch.com @ 2012-02-13 07:08:44 -->
